The fading of humanism in organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v19i2.473Keywords:
Humanismo, administración científica, responsabilidad social corporativaAbstract
The present research seeks to evaluate the validity of the precepts of humanistic theory in companies, or whether, on the contrary, this theory has lost ground against companies' efforts to reduce costs and maximize profits, following the teachings of scientific management regarding task simplification and process automation. The article is a literature review of recent authors and some classic original texts, maintaining the following structure. First, a brief description of the nature of organizations and the link formed with scientific management is provided. In a second part, the emergence of humanism and theories of individual motivation in organizations are analyzed. The third part describes the points of coincidence between humanism and scientific management that allow us to consider that they are not such opposing models, at least concerning what is established by classical humanism. Subsequently, some questions are raised about the humanistic model to conclude with an analysis that allows us to assert that humanism has faded within organizations. From the perspective of sustainable theories, humanism is not advisable if we start from the premise that human needs are limitless, as they would harm the environment. For new theories, humans cannot be above natural resources, as it would be a kind of suicide. The rights of individuals must be limited to respect the rights of the place where we live.
Downloads
References
Barba, A. (2007). Humanismo y organización: los dilemas de una reflexión. Administración y Organizaciones, 9(18), 31-47.
Bruce, K., Nyland, C. (2011). Elton Mayo and the deification of human relations. Organization Studies, 32(3), 383-405.
Coriat, B. (2001). El Taller y el cronómetro: ensayo sobre el taylorismo, el fordismo y la producción en masa. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Fleischman, R. K. (2000). Completing the triangle: taylorism and the paradigms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 597-623.
Garcia, G., & Larios-Gómez, E. (2017). Capítulo 4 Análisis del clima laboral de la Ibero-Puebla. En Administración. Un enfoque latinoamericano México-Brasil Coord. Larios-Gómez, E., & Giuliani, A. C., 2017. ISBN LIBRO IMPRESO: 978-607-32-4000-0. ISBN E-BOOK: 978-607-32-4005-5 Editorial Pearson: México.
Kaplan, H. R. y O. (1973, Agosto). Human relations perspectives on motivation: a critical appraisal. Presentado en la reunión de la asociación americana de sociología, Nueva Orleans, Louisiana.
March, J. G., Simon, H. A. (1987). Teoría de la organización. Recuperado de Bibliotecas del Tecnológico de Monterrey.
Morrow, A. A., Thayer, F. (1978) Materialism and humanism: organization theory´s odd couple. Administration and Society, 10, 86-106. doi: 10.1177/009539977801000104.
Osterloh , M. y Frey, B. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538-550.
Pindur, W., Rogers, S. E., y Kim, P. S. (1995). The history of management: a global perspective. Journal of Management History. 1(1), 59-77.
Prujit, H. (2000). Repainting, modifying, smashing taylorism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(5), 439-451.
Ritzer, G. (1993), The mcdonaldization of society: an investigation into the changing character of contemporary social life, Thousand Oaks, CA Pine Forge Press.
Scott, W. R. (2004). Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 1-21. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110644.
Shields, J., Grant, D. (2010). Psychologising the subject: hrm, commodification and the objectification of labour. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 20(2), 61-76.
Schneider, B., Alderfer, C. P. (1973) Three studies of measures of need satisfaction in organizations. Administrative Science Quaterly, 18(4), 489-505.
Vallas, S. P. (1999). Rethinking post-fordism: the meaning of workplace flexibility. Sociological Theory, 17, 78-101.
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The modern corporation: origins, evolution, attributes. Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1537-1568.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2019-10-19 (2)
- 2021-01-20 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 FACE: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.