Analysis of productivity in economic, administrative and accounting research based on google scholar profiles: the case of the University of Cartagena

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v24i2.3118

Keywords:

Bibliometric analysis, h-index, measurement, evaluation, performance

Abstract

This paper analyzes the h-index and its different variations (h5, i10) in programs related to the economic, administrative and accounting areas, taking as a case study the Faculty of Economic Sciences, FCE, of the University of Cartagena. A descriptive methodology was used with a sample of 37 teachers; the analysis included the collection of the h-index of each author, considering the academic programs of the FCE. A statistical calculation was performed to answer the initial question of the study. In addition to evaluating the h-index, aspects such as academic background, the program to which they belong, gender and the most productive author were explored. The study sought to provide a complete understanding of the academic landscape in economic sciences at the University of Cartagena, using the aforementioned methodology and presenting the current state of the indexes according to the theoretical review.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beltrán, O. (2006). Factor de impacto [Impact factor]. Revista Colombiana de Gastroenetrología, 21(1), 57–61.

Castro, E. C., Cedeño, J. D. A., Herrera, M. P. L., & … (2020). Análisis de los indicadores H, R, A para la producción científica en repositorio Dspace en la Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas en el período 2015. Serie Científica de La …, 13(9), 188–198. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8590304

Delgado-López-Cózar, E., Orduña-Malea, E., Jiménez-Contreras, E., & Ruiz-Pérez, R. (2014). H Index Scholar: el índice h de los profesores de las universidades públicas españolas en humanidades y ciencias sociales. Profesional de la Información, 23(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.01.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.ene.11

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7

Jorge, R. A., & Espino, R. C. (2008). Los índices H, G y R: Su uso para identificar autores líderes en el área de la comunicación durante el período 2001-2006. Acimed, 17(4), 1–9.

Martín-Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002

Miró, Ò., & Burbano, P. (2013). El factor de impacto, el índice h y otros indicadores bibliométricos. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 36(3), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272013000300001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4321/S1137-66272013000300001

Murillo-Gonzalez, D., Zapata, R., & López, O. (2023). Análisis de los perfiles de investigadores de Panamá e indicadores bibliométricos de Google Scholar. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 46(1), e349. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2023.1.1962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2023.1.1962

Paz Enrique, L. E., Hernández Alfonso, E. A., & Garcés González, R. (2015). Análisis de citas para la descripción de la calidad de las publicaciones científicas: El caso de la Revista Latina de Comunicación Social. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social. http://agora.edu.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5251728

Garfield, E. (2005). The agony and the ecstasy — The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90

Túñez-López, M., & de Pablos Coello, J. M. (2016). Posicionamiento y medición de impacto de artículos y revistas de investigación. January 2013.

Zarate, V., & Cerda, J. (2007). Fortalezas y debilidades del factor de impacto de revistas científicas. Revista Médica de Chile, 135(11), 1474–1478. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872007001100016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872007001100016

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28 — Updated on 2024-06-28

How to Cite

García Cediel, G., Jiménez Thorrens, J., & Cardona Arbelaez, D. (2024). Analysis of productivity in economic, administrative and accounting research based on google scholar profiles: the case of the University of Cartagena. FACE: Revista De La Facultad De Ciencias Económicas Y Empresariales, 24(2), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v24i2.3118

Issue

Section

Artículos