Speech Therapy Assessment Methodologies for the Pragmatic Component of Language in Infants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/rcsf.v1i1.2072Keywords:
Evaluation, comunication, protocol, Children's LanguageAbstract
Introduction: The purpose of this review was to gather available evidence from scientific databases regarding existing methodologies for assessing the pragmatic component of language that address speech act and communicative fact approaches. Methods: This study followed the Cochrane systematic review methodology, including controlled and uncontrolled trials that employed pragmatic language assessment in children aged 0 to 5 years and 11 months or the use of pragmatic component assessment protocols and instruments. A search was conducted in scientific and non-scientific databases and in additional sources of published trials. Results: A total of 92 studies were found according to the established criteria, of which 54 were included. An inventory of the available methodologies was made, describing their properties, aspects to be assessed, and ages of application. Analysis: Among the methodologies found, there is not one that manages to contain or account for the evaluation of illocutionary, perlocutionary and locutionary aspects and of communicative performance according to the roles assigned within communication. This makes it difficult to approach the theory of speech acts in the evaluation of language, limiting the natural dynamics of language at the discursive level. Conclusions: The studies reviewed so far refer to categories and systems of evaluation of pragmatics that are not very homogeneous. Keywords: Evaluation, Communication, Protocol, Children's Language.
Downloads
References
Pelaez A, Rodriguez J, Ramirez S, Perez L, Vasquez A, Gonzales L. La Entrevista.
Carol A. Prutting DMK. A Clinical Appraisal of the Pragmatic Aspects of Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1987;: p. 105-119.
Miguel Puyuelo Sanclemente LIMJSECORDC. Validación de los módulos semántico y pragmático de la Batería de Lenguaje Objetiva y Criterial (BLOC) en niños chilenos. Psicothema. 2006;: p. 326-332.
Gallardo B. Valoración del componente pragmático a partir de datos orales. REVNEUROL. 2009;: p. 57-61.
Bénédicte Blain-Brière CBNB. The role of executive functions in the pragmatic skills of children age 4–5. PubMed Central. 2014.
Montecinos JP. Adquisición y desarrollo del lenguaje y la comunicación: una visión pragmática constructivista centrada en los. Redalyc. 2000;: p. 54-66.
DEL VALLE ABRAHAM M, BRENCA RM. ANÁLISIS PSICOMÉTRICO DE LA EVALUACIÓN DEL ASPECTO PRAGMÁTICO DEL LENGUAJE. Redalyc. 2013;: p. 139-161.
Gallardo B. Habilidades lingüísticas pragmáticas en el Síndrome de Williams. Scielo. 2010.
Debora Maria Befi-Lopes MLPAREGJPGKdA. Perfil comunicativo de crianças com Alterações Específicas no Desenvolvimento da Linguagem: caracterização longitudinal das habilidades pragmáticas. Scielo. 2007;: p. 265-273.
Gallardo Paúls ByR. La investigación de los déficits pragmáticos Barcelona: Granada Linguistica; 2002.
Flecha MSR. Desde los actos de habla de Austin a los actos comunicativos. Perspectivas desde Searle, Habermas y CREA. Revista Signos. 2010;: p. 363-375.
Castello JAP. Entrenamiento de las habilidades comunicativas en niños con síndrome de Down. Anuario de Psicologia. 1997;: p. 75-95.
Angélica Savoldi LBBCLMBDCBHBM. Evaluation of pragmatic aspects of children with phonological disorders. CEFAC. 2014;: p. 1142-1150.
Clara Andres Roqueta RACE. Dificultades pragmáticas en el transtorno específico del lenguaje.El papel de las tareas mentalistas. Psicothema. 2010;: p. 677-683.
Clara Andres Roqueta RACRFB. Cognición social y competencia pragmática. El caso de los niños y niñas con trastorno esecifico del lenguaje. International Journal of Psychological Research. 2012;: p. 59-69.
Esther Moreno FD. Evaluación del componente pragmático en el Síndrome de Down a través del Protocolo Rápido de Evaluación Pragmática.. Investigacion en Logopedia. 2014;: p. 1-27.
Juan Manuel Moreno MEGEGMB. Competencia pragmática y adaptación psicosocial en niños sujetos a medidas de protección infantil. Salud Mental. 2010;: p. 333-340.
Maria del Valle Abraham RMB. Análisis psicométrico de la evaluación del aspecto pragmático del lenguaje infantil ICRA-A. Interdisciplinaria. 2014;: p. 139-161.
D B. Autismo, Síndrome de asperger y trastorno semántico-pragmático: ¿Dónde están los límites? 2004.
Hymes D. Competence and performance in linguistic theory. 1971;: p. 3-24.
Higgins JPT GS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011.
Carballo G. Guía para la evaluación del TEL: Algunas consideraciones. Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología. 2012;: p. 87-93.
ADAMS CYBDV. “Conversational characteristics of children with semantic-pragmatic disorder.1: Exchange structure, turntaking, repairs and cohesion. British Journal of Disorders of Communication.1989;: p. 211-239.
Catherine Adams AC. Assessment of metapragmatic skills in children with typical language development and children with language disorders. Manchester. 1884.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Mabel Xiomara Mogollón Tolosa, Edwin Mauricio Portilla Portilla

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.