COMPOSICIÓN DEL STOCK DE BUSCADORES DE EMPLEO EN EL MARKETING LABORAL: UN ENFOQUE DE FRONTERA ESTOCÁSTICA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v3i1.1795Palabras clave:
Función de emparejamiento, técnica eficiencia, frontera estocástica análisis, mercados laborales locales, heterogeneidadResumen
Este artículo investiga la eficiencia técnica del emparejamiento del mercado laboral tomando una frontera estocástica Acercarse. El conjunto de datos consta de datos mensuales de 145 Oficinas Laborales Locales (LLO) en Finlandia durante el período 1995/01-2004/09. Se utiliza el verdadero modelo de efectos fijos para separar heterogeneidad de la ineficiencia. Según los resultados, existen diferencias notables en la eficiencia del emparejamiento entre regiones, y estas diferencias contribuyen significativamente al número de vacantes cubiertas. Si todas las regiones fueran tan eficientes como el más eficiente, el número total de partidos por mes aumentaría en más de 10% Si la ineficiencia no tuviera ningún papel en la función de coincidencia, el número de coincidencias aumentaría en casi un 24 %. El peso de la composición del stock de demandantes de empleo y otras variables ambientales en la determinación de la ineficiencia de correspondencia es en promedio del 61 %. En particular, los buscadores de empleo fuera de la fuerza laboral y altamente buscadores de empleo educados mejoran la eficiencia técnica en la función de emparejamiento.
Descargas
Citas
Anderson, P. and Burgess, S. (2000) Empirical matching functions: Estimation and interpretation using
state-level data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 93-102.
Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier
production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332.
Blanchard, O. and Diamond, P. (1989) The Beveridge curve. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,
, 1-76.
Blanchard O. and Diamond P. (1994) Ranking, unemployment duration, and wages. Review of
Economic Studies, 61, 417-434.
Broersma L. (1997) Competition between employed and unemployed job searchers: is there a
difference between the UK and The Netherlands? Applied Economics Letters, 4, 199-203.
Broersma, L. and Van Ours, J. (1999) Job searchers, job matches and the elasticity of matching.
Labour Economics, 6, 77-93.
Budd A., Levine P., and Smith P. (1988) Unemployment, vacancies, and the long-term unemployed.
Economic Journal, 98, 1071-1091.
Burgess S. (1993) A model of competition between unemployed and employed job searchers: an
application to the unemployment outflow rate in Britain. Economic Journal, 103, 1190-1204.
Burgess S. and Turon H. (2003) Unemployment equilibrium and on-the-job search. IZA Discussion
Paper No. 753.
Coelli, T. (1997) A guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer program for stochastic frontier
production and cost estimation. CEPA Working paper 96/07.
Coelli, T., Perelman, S., and Romano, E. (1999) Accounting for environmental influences in stochastic
frontier models: with application to international airlines. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11, 251-273.
Coelli, T., Rao D.S., and Battese G. (1998) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis.
Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fahr, R. and Sunde, U. (2002) Estimations of occupational and regional matching efficiencies using
stochastic production frontier models. IZA Discussion paper 552.
Fahr, R. and Sunde, U. (2005) Regional dependencies in job creation: an efficiency analysis for
western Germany. IZA Discussion paper 1660.
Farrell, M.J. (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society
Series A, 120(3), 253-290.
Gautier, P., van den Berg, G., Van Ours, J., and Ridder, G. (2002) Worker turnover at the firm level and
crowding out of lower educated workers. European Economic Review, 46, 523-538.
Giannakas, K., Tran, K., and Tzouvelekas, V. (2003) On the choice of functional form in stochastic
frontier modelling. Empirical Economics, 28, 75-100.
Greene, W. (2005a) Fixed and random effects in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Productivity
Analysis, 23, 7-32.
Greene, W. (2005b) Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier
model. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 269-303.
Gregg and Petrongolo (2005) Stock-flow matching and the performance of the labor market. European
Economic Review, 49, 1987-2011.
Hynninen, S., Kangasharju, A., and Pehkonen, J. (2006). Regional Matching Frictions and Aggregate
Unemployment. VATT Discussion Paper 383.
Hynninen, S. and Lahtonen, J. (2007) Does population density matter in the process of matching
heterogeneous job seekers and vacancies? Forthcoming in Empirica.
Hämäläinen H. (2003) Työvoiman rekrytointi toimipaikoissa vuonna 2002, [in Finnish], Ministry of
Labour, Helsinki.
Ibourk, A., Maillard, B., Perelman, S., and Sneessens, H. (2004) Aggregate matching efficiency: A
stochastic production frontier approach, France 1990-1994. Empirica, 31, 1-25.
Ilmakunnas, P. and Pesola, H. (2003) Regional labour market matching functions and efficiency
analysis. Labour, 17 (3), 413-437.
Kim, Y. and Schmidt, P. (2000) A review and empirical comparison of Bayesian and classical approaches to
inference on efficiency levels in stochastic frontier models with panel data. Journal of Productivity Analysis,
, 91-118.
Kumbhakar, S. and Lovell, C.A. (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University press.
Lahtonen, J. (2006) Matching heterogeneous job seekers and vacancies: Empirical studies using
Finnish data. Jyväskylä Studies in Business and Economics 50.
Layard R. and Bean C. (1989) Why does unemployment persist? Scandinavian Journal of Economics,
, 371-396.
Mumford K. And Smith P. (1999) The hiring function reconsidered: on closing the circle. Oxford Bulletin
of Economics and Statistics, 61, 343-364.
Petrongolo B. and Pissarides C. (2001) Looking into the black box: a survey of the matching function.
Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 390-431.
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 1371-1391.
Pissarides C. (1994) Search unemployment with on-the-job search, Review of Economic Studies, 61,
-475.
Pissarides C. (2000) Equilibrium unemployment theory, MIT Press.
Sicherman, N. (1991) “Overeducation” in the labor market. Journal of Labor Economics, 9, 101-122.
Van Ours J. (1995) An empirical note on employed and unemployed job search. Economics Letters, 49,
-452.
Van Ours, J. and Ridder, G. (1995) Job matching and job competition: Are lower educated workers at
the back of queues? European Economic Review, 39, 1717-1731.
