CAPITAL SOCIAL COORPORATIVO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v3i1.1794Keywords:
Capital social, corporaciones, partes interesadas, reputación, creyentesAbstract
Este artículo discute los conceptos de stakeholders, reputación y capital social y su relevancia para corporaciones en la sociedad moderna. El documento argumenta que existe una demanda especial para la gestión de la reputación. en las comunicaciones corporativas y las relaciones públicas de hoy en día debido a la fragmentación de los públicos y las partes interesadas, así como en cuanto al mayor interés público en las corporaciones. La introducción de medios en tiempo real también ha impuesto nuevos demandas que las corporaciones de hoy deben cumplir para sobrevivir. Diferentes partes interesadas poseen la capacidad de beneficiarse pero también para perjudicar a las corporaciones a través de la reputación corporativa. Las relaciones cultivadas con las partes interesadas pueden ser especialmente beneficioso para la reputación corporativa y el desarrollo a largo plazo, y los lazos sociales que las partes interesadas encarnar puede incluso ser visto como capital social para la corporación. También se crea un nuevo concepto de “poseedores de fe”. presentado para describir mejor el capital social corporativo.
Downloads
References
B. (1975). Organisationsteori. Om byråkrati, administration och självsyre. (in Swedish:
”Organization theory. On bureaucracy, administration and self governance”) Awe/Gebers: Stockholm.
Aula, P. & Heinonen, J. (2002). Maine. Menestystekijä. (In Finnish: Reputation, The Success maker.) WSOY:
Helsinki.
Bentele, G. (2005). Vertrauen und Glaubwürdichkeit. Begriffe, Ansätze, Forschungsübersicht und
praktische Relevanz. (In German: “Trust and Credibility. Concepts, formation, a research overview
and practical relevance”) In Bentele, G., Fröhlich, R. & Szyszka, P. (eds.) Handbuch Public Relations
(In German: “Handbook of Public Relations”). Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.
Bromley, D.B. (1993). Reputation, Image and Impression Management. Wiley: West Sussex.
Calton, J.M. & Kurland, N.B. (1996). A theory of Stakeholder Enabling. Giving voice to an Emerging
Postmodern Praxis of Organizational Discourse. In Boje, D.M., Gephart, Jr, R.P. & Thatchenkery, T.J.
(eds.). Postmodern management and organizational theory. Sage: Thousand Lakes.
Carroll A. B. (1993). Business and Society. Ethics and Stakeholder Management. 2nd Edition. South-
Western Publishing: Cincinnati.
Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social
Performance. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 92-117.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, Vol.
, Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the
Analysis of Social Structure, pp. S95-S120.
Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R. V. & Roper, S. (2004). A corporate Character Scale to Assess Employee
and Customer Views of Organizational Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review. Vol 7, No. 2, pp.
-146.
Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence,
implications. Academy of Management Review. No. 20, pp. 65-91.
Edelman Trust Barometer (2006) [online] [cited 1.9.2006]
http://www.edelman.com/image/insights/content/FullSupplement.pdf#search=%22Edelman%20Trust
%20Barometer%20(2006)%22>
Eurobarometer (2005). Public opinion in the European Union. [online] [cited 18.4.2006].
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb64/eb64_en.htm >
Fombrun, C. & van Riel, C. (2003). Fame and Fortune: how successful companies build winning
reputations. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.
Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation. Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Harvard Business School:
Boston.
Freeman, R.E. (1995). Stakeholder thinking: The State of the Art. In Näsi, J. (ed.). Understanding
Stakeholder Thinking. LSR-julkaisut: Jyväskylä.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: Boston.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free Press: New York.
Granowetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American
Journal of Sociology. No. 91, pp. 481-510.
Granowetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, No. 78, 6, pp. 1360-
Grunig L., Grunig J. & Ehling W. (1992). What Is an Effective Organization? In Grunig, J. Dozier, D., Ehling,
W. Grunig, L., Repper, F & White, J. (eds.) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication
Management. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale NJ, pp. 65-90.
Grunig, J., Dozier, D., Ehling, W. Grunig, L., Repper, F. & White, J. (Eds.) (1992). Excellence in Public
Relations and Communication Management. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
Hatch, M. (1997) Organization Theory. Modern Symbolic and Postmodern Perspectives. Oxford
University Press: New York.
Jawahar, I. M. & McLaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: an organizational life
cycle approach. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 397-414.
Jones, T. M. & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, No.
, pp. 206-221.
Kreps, G. L. (1990). Organizational Communication: Theory and practice. 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley:
New York.
Kotler, P. (1975). Marketing for nonprofit-making organizations. Prentice-Hall: Engelwood Cliffs, New
Jersey.
Lehtonen, J. (2000). Toimiva viestintä. Yrityksen aineetonta pääomaa. (In Finnish: “Functional Communication.
Corporate intangible capital”) In Aula, P. & Hakala, S. (eds.) Kolmet kasvot. Näkökulmia
organisaatioviestintään (In Finnish: “Three faces, approaches to organizational communication”).
Loki-Kirjat: Helsinki, pp. 187-210.
Lin, N. (2005). A Network Theory of Social Capital. In Castiglione, D., van Deth, J. & Wolleb, G. (eds.).
Handbook on Social Capital, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge.
Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences: Vol. 20, No. 2,
pp. 130–141.
Luoma-aho, V. (2007). Reputation Formation of Innovations. A paper presented at the Fourth Conference
on Innovation Journalism, “Journalism driving Innovation, Innovation driving Journalism”, Stanford
University, USA, May 21nd-23th 2007.
Luoma-aho, V. (2005). Faith-holders as Social Capital of Finnish Public Organizations. Jyväskylä Studies
in Humanities, 42. University of Jyväskylä. [online] [cited 1.9.2006].
http://dissertations.jyu.fi/studhum/9513922626.pdf>
Luoma-aho, V. (2005b). Viestintä, maine ja organisaation sosiaalinen pääoma (In Finnish: ”Communication,
Reputation and organizational social capital”). In Jokivuori, P. (ed.) Sosiaalisen pääoman kentät (In
Finnish: ”The fields of Social Capital”) Minerva: Jyväskylä, pp. 393-413.
Markkanen, T-R. (1999). Yrityksen identiteetin johtaminen. Tulkintaa, viestintää ja sitoutumista. (In
Finnish: ”Management of corporate identity. Interpretation, communication and commitment”) WSOY:
Helsinki.
Mitchell R., Agle, B. & Wood D. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining
the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 22, No. 4, pp.
– 886.
Näsi, J. (1979). Yrityksen suunnittelun perusteet. (In Finnish: ”Foundations of Corporate Design”) Yrityksen
taloustieteen ja yksityisoikeuden laitoksen Julkaisuja A 1:15. University of Tampere.
Ojala, J., Hakoluoto, T., Hjorth, A. & Luoma-aho, V. (2006). Hyvä paha sosiaalinen pääoma (In Finnish: “Good
and Bad Social Capital”). In Jokivuori, P., Latva-karjanmaa, R. & Ropo, A. (eds.) Työelämän
taitekohtia (In Finnish: “Turning points of working life”). Työpoliittinen tutkimus, Työministeriö:
Helsinki.
Patulny, R. (2003). Bonding, bridging and investment: important aspects of a national social capital policy
strategy. Melbourne Journal of Politics. January 03.
Pharoah, A. (2003). Corporate reputation: the boardroom challenge. Corporate Governance. Vol. 3, No. 4,
pp. 46-51.
Pizzorno, A. (2004). Resources of Social Capital: Reputation and Visibility. A presentation given at the
ECSR Summer School on Social Capital, Trento Italy, August 22nd -27th, 2004.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon &
Schuster: New York.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
Savage, G., Campbell, K., Patman, T. & Nunnelley, L. (2000). Beyond Managed Costs. Current Trends and
Future Issues. Health Care Management Review. Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 93-108.
Rindova, V., Williamson, I., Petkova, A. & Sever, J. (2005) ‘Being good or being known: an empirical
examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation’,
Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1033-1049.
Rothstein, B. (2003). Sociala fällor och tillitens problem (In Swedish: “Social traps and the problem of
trust”). SNS Förlag: Stockholm.
Ruuskanen, P. (2001). Sosiaalinen pääoma- käsitteet, suuntaukset ja mekanismit (In Finnish: ”Social
Capital - concepts, tendencies and mechanisms”). VATT: Helsinki.
Savage, G., Campbell, K., Patman, T. & Nunnelley, L. (2000). Beyond Managed Costs. Current Trends and
Future Issues. Health Care Management Review. Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 93-108.
Schein, E. H. (1994). Organizational Psychology. 3rd Edition. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River.
Sjovall, A. & Talk, A. (2004). From Actions to Impressions: Cognitive Attribution Theory and the Formation of
Corporate Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review. Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 269-281.
Sztompka, P. (2000). Trust. A Sociological Theory. Cambridge University Press: Port Chester, NJ.
Transparancy International Corruption Perceptions Index (2004). [online] [cited 8.4.2004].
http://www.transparency.org/cpi/2003/cpi2003.en.html>
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Macmillan: N
