CORPORATE SOCIAL CAPITAL

Authors

  • VILMA LUOMA-AHO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v10i1.1811

Keywords:

Capital social, corporaciones, stakeholders, reputación, faith-holders

Abstract

Este artículo habla de los conceptos de stakeholders, reputación y la capital social y su importancia para corporaciones en la sociedad moderna. El artículo argumenta que hay una demanda especial de la dirección de reputación en comunicaciones corporativas de hoy y relaciones públicas debido a públicos fragmentados y stakeholders, así como al interés aumentado público a corporaciones. La introducción de medios de comunicación en tiempo real también ha impuesto las nuevas demandas que las corporaciones hoy deben encontrar para sobrevivir. stakeholders diferentes poseen la capacidad de beneficiarse, pero también dañar las corporaciones por la reputación corporativa. Relaciones de stakeholders cultas pueden ser sobre todo beneficiosas a la reputación corporativa y el desarrollo a largo plazo, y los lazos sociales que los stakeholders incorporan aún puede ser visto
como la capital social para la corporación. Un nuevo concepto "Faith-holders" también es presentado para describir mejor una
corporación de capital social.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahamsson, B. (1975). Organisationsteori. Om byråkrati, administration och

självsyre. (in Swedish: ”Organization theory. On bureaucracy, administration and

self governance”) Awe/Gebers: Stockholm.

· Aula, P. & Heinonen, J. (2002). Maine. Menestystekijä. (In Finnish: Reputation,

The Success maker.) WSOY: Helsinki.

· Bentele, G. (2005). Vertrauen und Glaubwürdichkeit. Begriffe, Ansätze,

Forschungsübersicht und praktische Relevanz. (In German: “Trust and Credibility.

Concepts, formation, a research overview and practical relevance”) In Bentele, G.,

Fröhlich, R. & Szyszka, P. (eds.) Handbuch Public Relations (In German:

“Handbook of Public Relations”). Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften: Wiesbaden.

· Bromley, D.B. (1993). Reputation, Image and Impression Management. Wiley:

West Sussex.

Calton, J.M. & Kurland, N.B. (1996). A theory of Stakeholder Enabling. Giving

voice to an Emerging Postmodern Praxis of Organizational Discourse. In Boje,

D.M., Gephart, Jr, R.P. & Thatchenkery, T.J. (eds.). Postmodern management and

organizational theory. Sage: Thousand Lakes.

· Carroll A. B. (1993). Business and Society. Ethics and Stakeholder Management.

nd Edition. South-Western Publishing: Cincinnati.

· Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating

Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 20, No. 1,

pp. 92-117.

· Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American

Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, Supplement: Organizations and Institutions:

Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure, pp.

S95-S120.

· Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R. V. & Roper, S. (2004). A corporate Character

Scale to Assess Employee and Customer Views of Organizational Reputation.

Corporate Reputation Review. Vol 7, No. 2, pp. 125-146.

· Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation:

Concepts, evidence, implications. Academy of Management Review. No. 20, pp.

-91.

· Edelman Trust Barometer (2006) [online] [cited 1.9.2006]

http://www.edelman.com/image/insights/content/FullSupplement.pdf#search=

%22Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20(2006)%22>

· Eurobarometer (2005). Public opinion in the European Union. [online] [cited

4.2006].

http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb64/eb64_en.htm >

· Fombrun, C. & van Riel, C. (2003). Fame and Fortune: how successful companies

build winning reputations. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.

· Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation. Realizing Value from the Corporate Image.

Harvard Business School: Boston.

· Freeman, R.E. (1995). Stakeholder thinking: The State of the Art. In Näsi, J. (ed.).

Understanding Stakeholder Thinking. LSR-julkaisut: Jyväskylä.

· Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman:

Boston.

· Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Free

Press: New York.

· Granowetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of

embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology. No. 91, pp. 481-510.

· Granowetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of

Sociology, No. 78, 6, pp. 1360-1380.

Grunig L., Grunig J. & Ehling W. (1992). What Is an Effective Organization? In

Grunig, J. Dozier, D., Ehling, W. Grunig, L., Repper, F & White, J. (eds.)

Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale NJ, pp. 65-90.

· Grunig, J., Dozier, D., Ehling, W. Grunig, L., Repper, F. & White, J. (Eds.) (1992).

Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Lawrence

Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.

· Hatch, M. (1997) Organization Theory. Modern Symbolic and Postmodern

Perspectives. Oxford University Press: New York.

· Jawahar, I. M. & McLaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder

theory: an organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review.

Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 397-414.

· Jones, T. M. & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of

Management Review, No. 24, pp. 206-221.

· Kreps, G. L. (1990). Organizational Communication: Theory and practice. 2nd

edition. Addison-Wesley: New York.

· Kotler, P. (1975). Marketing for nonprofit-making organizations. Prentice-Hall:

Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey.

· Lehtonen, J. (2000). Toimiva viestintä. Yrityksen aineetonta pääomaa. (In Finnish:

“Functional Communication. Corporate intangible capital”) In Aula, P. & Hakala,

S. (eds.) Kolmet kasvot. Näkökulmia organisaatioviestintään (In Finnish: “Three

faces, approaches to organizational communication”). Loki-Kirjat: Helsinki, pp.

-210.

· Lin, N. (2005). A Network Theory of Social Capital. In Castiglione, D., van Deth, J.

& Wolleb, G. (eds.). Handbook on Social Capital, Oxford University Press:

Oxford.

· Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge

University Press: Cambridge.

· Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric

Sciences: Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 130–141.

· Luoma-aho, V. (2007). Reputation Formation of Innovations. A paper presented at

the Fourth Conference on Innovation Journalism, “Journalism driving Innovation,

Innovation driving Journalism”, Stanford University, USA, May 21nd-23th 2007.

· Luoma-aho, V. (2005). Faith-holders as Social Capital of Finnish Public

Organizations. Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities, 42. University of Jyväskylä. [online]

[cited 1.9.2006]. http://dissertations.jyu.fi/studhum/9513922626.pdf>

· Luoma-aho, V. (2005b). Viestintä, maine ja organisaation sosiaalinen pääoma (In

Finnish: ”Communication, Reputation and organizational social capital”). In

Jokivuori, P. (ed.) Sosiaalisen pääoman kentät (In Finnish: ”The fields of Social

Capital”) Minerva: Jyväskylä, pp. 393-413.

Markkanen, T-R. (1999). Yrityksen identiteetin johtaminen. Tulkintaa, viestintää ja

sitoutumista. (In Finnish: ”Management of corporate identity. Interpretation,

communication and commitment”) WSOY: Helsinki.

· Mitchell R., Agle, B. & Wood D. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder

Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really

Counts. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 853 – 886.

· Näsi, J. (1979). Yrityksen suunnittelun perusteet. (In Finnish: ”Foundations of

Corporate Design”) Yrityksen taloustieteen ja yksityisoikeuden laitoksen Julkaisuja

A 1:15. University of Tampere.

· Ojala, J., Hakoluoto, T., Hjorth, A. & Luoma-aho, V. (2006). Hyvä paha sosiaalinen

pääoma (In Finnish: “Good and Bad Social Capital”). In Jokivuori, P., Latvakarjanmaa,

R. & Ropo, A. (eds.) Työelämän taitekohtia (In Finnish: “Turning

points of working life”). Työpoliittinen tutkimus, Työministeriö: Helsinki.

· Patulny, R. (2003). Bonding, bridging and investment: important aspects of a

national social capital policy strategy. Melbourne Journal of Politics. January 03.

· Pharoah, A. (2003). Corporate reputation: the boardroom challenge. Corporate

Governance. Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 46-51.

· Pizzorno, A. (2004). Resources of Social Capital: Reputation and Visibility. A

presentation given at the ECSR Summer School on Social Capital, Trento Italy,

August 22nd -27th, 2004.

· Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American

Community. Simon & Schuster: New York.

· Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton University Press:

Princeton, NJ.

· Savage, G., Campbell, K., Patman, T. & Nunnelley, L. (2000). Beyond Managed Costs.

Current Trends and Future Issues. Health Care Management Review. Vol. 25, No. 1, pp.

-108.

Published

2022-10-31

How to Cite

LUOMA-AHO, V. (2022). CORPORATE SOCIAL CAPITAL. FACE: Revista De La Facultad De Ciencias Económicas Y Empresariales, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v10i1.1811

Issue

Section

Artículos