Uncertainty and chance in surgical practice: a narrative literature revision of navigating the labyrinth of uncertain outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/cbs.v4i2.4398Keywords:
surgical decision making, clinical uncertainty, intraoperative complications, clinical judgment, surgical risk managementAbstract
Introduction: Surgery is a discipline that operates within an environment of inherent uncertainty, where chance and unpredictability directly influence processes and outcomes. This review seeks to explore the sources and impact of uncertainty in surgery and propose strategies for its effective management. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on concepts of uncertainty, variability, decision-making, and patient safety in surgical contexts. The synthesis aims to identify applicable conceptual frameworks and tools. Results: Uncertainty in surgery manifests in three main domains: biological (unpredictable physiological response of the patient), technical (anatomical and skill variability), and cognitive (limitations in processing complex information). Chance influences the occurrence of rare but critical complications. Strategies such as checklists, simulation of adverse scenarios, peer review of cases, and the development of experiential clinical judgments have been shown to mitigate the negative effects of uncertainty. Conclusion: Uncertainty and chance are inherent and unavoidable elements of surgical practice. Rather than ignoring them, surgical systems must develop a "culture of uncertainty" that fosters clinical humility, preparedness for the unexpected, and adaptability. Integrating these strategies is crucial for advancing toward safer and more resilient surgery.
Downloads
References
Yang Z, Hanoch Y, Safra Z, Melkonyan T, Potparic O, Palmer J. Medical decision-making under risk and uncertainty: Anesthetists’ decision to proceed with surgery. Risk Anal. 2025;45(9):2771–89. doi:10.1111/risa.14375
Filiberto AC, Efron PA, Frantz A, Bihorac A, Upchurch GR, Loftus TJ. Personalized decision-making for acute cholecystitis: Understanding surgeon judgment. Front Digit Health. 2022;4:845453. doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.845453
Shinkunas LA, Klipowicz CJ, Carlisle EM. Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20:190. doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0
Sommovilla JM. How shared decision-making mitigates surgeon regret in poor outcomes. AMA J Ethics. 2025;27(3):201–6. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2025.201.
Weprin S, Crocerossa F, Meyer D, et al. Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps. Patient Saf Surg. 2021;15:24. doi:10.1186/s13037-021-00297-3
Damen J, van Aken R, van der Veer SN, et al. Predictive analytics to support surgical decision-making. Br J Surg. 2023;110(5):559–70. doi:10.1093/bjs/znad080
Pitts S, Lodge A, Stoll J, Katz P. Communicating clinical uncertainty: a narrative review and framework. Patient Educ Couns. 2024;117:108016. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2023.108016
Connor CW. Decision-making in anesthesiology under uncertainty: cognitive biases, risk perception, and error. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021;34(2):168–74. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000994
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Basic Health sciencies journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




