Educational inequality and digital divide: a post-technological acceleration analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/ripcs.v4i1.4011Keywords:
educational inequality, digital divide, COVID-19, technological acceleration, digital inclusion, educational policyAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic acted as an unforeseen catalyst for technological adoption in education globally. While this acceleration opened new avenues for learning, it also exacerbated pre-existing educational inequalities, closely linked to the digital divide. This bibliographic study analyzed academic literature and relevant reports published mainly between 2020 and 2024 to investigate the reconfiguration of educational inequality in the context of increased reliance on digital technologies. The dimensions of the digital divide (access, use, and skills) and their differential impact on various student groups were examined. The research delved into how policies implemented during and after the health crisis addressed, or failed to address, these disparities. Findings indicated that, despite efforts, the rapid transition to remote education and hybrid models tended to widen differences in learning outcomes, disproportionately affecting students from vulnerable socioeconomic backgrounds, rural areas, and those with special educational needs. It was concluded that the mere provision of technology was insufficient without comprehensive strategies addressing digital competencies, adequate pedagogical support, and underlying socioeconomic barriers. This analysis underscored the urgency of inclusive and equitable educational policies in the digital age.
References
Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., Lazzarini, S. G., Vassolo, R. S., Charreau, A. D., & Scheer, M. B. (2020). Multinational corporations and an increasingly unequal world: A review and research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(8), 1266-1286.
Arias, E., Hincapie, D., & Paredes, D. (2021). Educación en pandemia: Respuestas y políticas en América Latina y el Caribe. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
Banco Mundial. (2022). The State of Global Learning Poverty: 2022 Update. World Bank.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Carnoy, M., & Levin, H. M. (1985). Schooling and work in the democratic state. Stanford University Press.
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura [UNESCO]. (2021b). What have we learnt? Lessons from COVID-19 education disruption. UNESCO.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2021). The State of Global Education: 18 Months into the Pandemic. OECD Publishing.
Plan International. (2020). Living under lockdown: Girls and COVID-19. Plan International.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., ... & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version, 1, b92.
Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. Routledge.
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rodrigo García Sagrado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
