Methodology for the analysis of quality costs in vertical building construction projects.

Abstract

Today's human relations present scenarios that a few years ago would have been unthinkable or unlikely, social dynamics is moving forward by leaps and bounds, and the law, as a means of behavioral regulation, must be modified to the social unison, and it is there, where through its formal sources, such as law, jurisprudence, and doctrine, legal science advances adapting to the needs of the people. An example of this is represented by polyamory, considered as the relationship between more than two people simultaneously with full consent, which implies a higher stage in the legal science.
An example of this is polyamory, considered as the relationship between more than two people simultaneously with full consent, which implies a higher stage in the sentimental plane, of maturity, and in the affective and legal consequences that such interaction entails, so that, through the suspected category of indirect discrimination, and through the amparo trial, the human right to the free development of personality is recognized, which in due time will reform the articles that regulate the legal institution of marriage and concubinage. Such is the case of the indirect amparo number 1227/2020, filed in the Eighth District Court in Civil, Administrative and Labor Amparo Matters and Labor and Social Security Matters, which will eventually reform the articles that regulate the legal institution of marriage and cohabitation.
Civil, Administrative and Labor and Federal Lawsuits in the State of Puebla, where a study of articles 1 and 4 of the Constitution, in relation to numbers 294 and 297 of the substantive civil law in Puebla, recognizes polyaffective relationships as a form of sexual preference, and a way of constituting a family, whose derivations can trigger a problem in the area of civil status, patrimonial, social security, kinship, inheritance, so that its due regulation should be a matter of legal operators, such as lawyers, judges, but also of transdisciplinary work,
judges, but also the transdisciplinary work of psychologists, anthropologists, sociologists, among others, so that through lines of thought, such as iusnaturalism, positive law, the three-dimensional theory of law, the theory of social justice, the theory of fundamental rights and weighting, the due regulation of polyamory in question can be justified.