Bioethics in the agricultural sector, a managerial commitment towards sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/cyta.v10i2.4215Keywords:
Moral, ethics, agroethics, agricultural management, sustainable developmentAbstract
Biological collections are veritable treasures of information that provide an invaluable historical perspective on biodiversity. These collections play an important role in various fields, both in research from taxonomy and ecology to the conservation of biodiversity. Thanks to biological collections, it is possible to find a source of historical record where covers the distribution and composition of different species over the years, in addition, by preserving these specimens, researchers can compare biological diversity at different times, which makes it possible to detect changes and/or loss of genetic diversity. To this end, a research was carried out with a descriptive non-experimental field design in 120 hectares of the María Lucia Metropolitan Park of the University Corporation of Meta. The biological collection of lepidoptera, being an important component in ecosystems, provides valuable information on biodiversity, climate effects and anthropogenic impacts. On the other hand, these biological collections play a crucial role in terms of education and scientific dissemination, so that in academic institutions they are not simply stores of specimens, living repositories that document the rich diversity of a specific region. The collections foster a greater understanding and appreciation of nature, in a world where biodiversity is threatened, these riches of information not only store the past but also guide the future of environmental conservation.
Downloads
References
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Caicedo-López, L. H., Villagómez Aranda, A. L., Sáenz de la O, D., Espinoza Márquez, E., Zavala Gómez, C. E., & Romero Zepeda, H. (2021). Elicitores: implicaciones bioéticas para la agricultura y la salud humana. Revista Bioética, 29(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422021291448
Castelló, E. (2019). La sostenibilidad como modelo de gestión empresarial. Economistas, (33), 22–25. https://www.economistas.es/Contenido/Consejo/Revistas/Economistas33-WEB-3.pdf
Cárdenas K. R. (2019). El derecho ante la técnica de edición genética. CRISPR. Acta Bioethica, 25(2), 187–197. https://actabioethica.uchile.cl/index.php/AB/article/view/54799/57876 .
Dorrego, A. (2021). El complejo productivo ecológico “Potencial estrategia de fomento de la transición agroecológica en Bolivia”. LEISA Revista de Agroecología, 37 (1), 39-44. https://leisa-al.org/web/wp-content/uploads/vol37n1.pdf
Daws, S. (2020). Pragmatismo filosófico y aborto. Voces en Bioética, 6. https://doi.org/10.7916/vib.v6i.5893
Encyclopedia of Bioethics. (2014). Encyclopedia of bioethics (Macmillan Reference). Macmillan Reference USA.
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5.ª ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1997). Verdad y método (2ª ed.). Ediciones Sígueme.
Hans-Martin, S. y Fritz, J. (2008), “Concept of Bioethics”, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 279-295.
Hall, R. T. (2016). Casuística y principialismo. Dilemata, (20), 33–48. Recuperado de https://www.dilemata.net/revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/421.
Hincapié, J., & Medina, M. (2019). Bioética: teorías y principios. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/13/6006/1.pdf
Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. (1988). The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. University of California Press.
León Correa, F. (2022). Bioética y crisis ecológica. Revista bioeticaweb https://www.bioeticaweb.com/bioetica-y-crisis-ecologica/
Lanz, B., Dietz, S., & Swanson, T. (2018). The expansion of modern agriculture and global biodiversity decline: An integrated assessment. Ecological Economics, 144, 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.018
Martínez-Quintero, S. (2019). Justicia distributiva. Universidad Católica de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho. https://hdl.handle.net/10983/23838
Molano Quintero, Y. M. y García Villalobos, A. C. (2021). Identificación de conflictos éticos y bioéticos relacionados con los pesticidas en Colombia. CITAS, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.15332/24224529.6738
Moratalla, T. D., & Feito Grande, L. (2020). Bioética narrativa (2.ª ed.). Guillermo Escolar Editor.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Britten, N., Rodgers, M., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Swindon: ESRC Methods Programme.
Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. (2018). Experiencias agroecológicas innovadoras, sostenibles y rentables. https://files.acquia.undp.org/public/migration/uy/undp-uy-ppd-ficha-Graneco-2018.pdf
Reyes-Palomino, S. E., & Cano Ccoa, D. M. (2022). Efectos de la agricultura intensiva y el cambio climático sobre la biodiversidad. Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas, 24(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.18271/ria.2022.328
Schramme, T. (2017). Empatía y altruismo. En H. Maibom (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of empathy (pp. 203–214). Routledge.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. SAGE.
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1992). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Paidós.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., ... & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rubén Darío Boscán Sánchez, Hebandreyna González García
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
