Reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the distal third of the leg, ankle and foot using perforator-based local flaps: anatomical-clinical narrative review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24054/coh.v15i2.4558

Keywords:

Perforating flap, helix flap, lower limb reconstruction, distal leg, ankle, foot, free flap, Reverse sural flap

Abstract

Introduction: Soft tissue defects of the distal third of the leg, ankle and foot are a reconstructive challenge due to the limited availability of local tissue, frequent exposure of deep structures and the need to preserve the main vascular axes. Objective: To synthesize the anatomical-clinical evidence on anatomically identified perforator-based local flaps and compare them with regional or free alternatives in terms of survival and complications. Methodology: A narrative review guided by SANRA was conducted, with a search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, limited to publications from 2016 to 2026 in Spanish and English. We included relevant clinical studies, comparative studies, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and narrative reviews; the selection flow was documented descriptively with a scheme adapted from PRISMA 2020, with no formal counts available. Results: The included evidence shows high survival and low total failure of local perforator flaps in small and medium defects. The comparative meta-analysis reported comparable global failure between free flap and perforator helix flap, although with greater partial necrosis in the latter. In comparative studies and clinical series, venous congestion appears as a relevant and cross-sectional complication, also observed in the reverse sural flap. Conclusions: Local perforator-based flaps are a reasonable first-line option in small and medium defects, especially where microsurgery is not available. No clear reduction in complications compared to the free flap was demonstrated; The decision should be individualized according to the size of the defect, comorbidity, availability of microsurgery, and team experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Juan Sebastián Figueroa Legarda , Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá

     

     

References

Low OW, Sebastin SJ, Cheah AEJ. A review of pedicled perforator flaps for reconstruction of the soft tissue defects of the leg and foot. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019;52(1):26-36. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1688103.

Ellabban MA, Awad AI, Hallock GG. Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2020;34(3):200-206. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1715154.

Yildirim T, Unsal SS, Armangil M. Propeller flap: orthoplastic approach for coverage of distal leg and ankle defects. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;27(8):874-878. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2020.11.009.

Gupta S, Gupta P, Khichar P, Mohammad A, Escandón JM, Kalra S. Perforator propeller flaps for lower extremity soft tissue defect reconstruction: shortening the learning curve. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022;27:101831.doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101831.

Bekara F, Herlin C, Mojallal A, Sinna R, Ayestaray B, Letois F, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity defects: identification of risk factors for complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(1):314-331. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001891.

Bekara F, Herlin C, Somda S, de Runz A, Grolleau JL, Chaput B. Free versus perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: ¿what is the safest coverage? A meta-analysis. Microsurgery. 2018;38(1):109-119. doi:10.1002/micr.30047.

Ota M, Motomiya M, Watanabe N, Shimoda K, Iwasaki N. Clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps versus free flaps in soft tissue reconstruction for lower leg and foot trauma: a retrospective single-centre comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):297. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07433-x.

Abualhaj S, Abualhaj MM, Dawod MS, et al. Reverse sural artery flap for lower extremity reconstruction: a multicenter retrospective analysis of success and failure patterns. J Orthop Traumatol. 2025;26:53. doi:10.1186/s10195-025-00860-z.

Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA, a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

Issue

Section

Artículos