Reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the distal third of the leg, ankle and foot using perforator-based local flaps: anatomical-clinical narrative review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24054/coh.v15i2.4558

Keywords:

Perforating flap, helix flap, lower limb reconstruction, distal leg, ankle, foot, free flap, Reverse sural flap

Abstract

Introduction: Soft tissue defects of the distal third of the leg, ankle and foot are a reconstructive challenge due to the limited availability of local tissue, frequent exposure of deep structures and the need to preserve the main vascular axes. Objective: To synthesize the anatomical-clinical evidence on anatomically identified perforator-based local flaps and compare them with regional or free alternatives in terms of survival and complications. Methodology: A narrative review guided by SANRA was conducted, with a search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library, limited to publications from 2016 to 2026 in Spanish and English. We included relevant clinical studies, comparative studies, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and narrative reviews; the selection flow was documented descriptively with a scheme adapted from PRISMA 2020, with no formal counts available. Results: The included evidence shows high survival and low total failure of local perforator flaps in small and medium defects. The comparative meta-analysis reported comparable global failure between free flap and perforator helix flap, although with greater partial necrosis in the latter. In comparative studies and clinical series, venous congestion appears as a relevant and cross-sectional complication, also observed in the reverse sural flap. Conclusions: Local perforator-based flaps are a reasonable first-line option in small and medium defects, especially where microsurgery is not available. No clear reduction in complications compared to the free flap was demonstrated; The decision should be individualized according to the size of the defect, comorbidity, availability of microsurgery, and team experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Low OW, Sebastin SJ, Cheah AEJ. A review of pedicled perforator flaps for reconstruction of the soft tissue defects of the leg and foot. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019;52(1):26-36. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1688103.

Ellabban MA, Awad AI, Hallock GG. Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2020;34(3):200-206. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1715154.

Yildirim T, Unsal SS, Armangil M. Propeller flap: orthoplastic approach for coverage of distal leg and ankle defects. Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;27(8):874-878. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2020.11.009.

Gupta S, Gupta P, Khichar P, Mohammad A, Escandón JM, Kalra S. Perforator propeller flaps for lower extremity soft tissue defect reconstruction: shortening the learning curve. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022;27:101831.doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101831.

Bekara F, Herlin C, Mojallal A, Sinna R, Ayestaray B, Letois F, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity defects: identification of risk factors for complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(1):314-331. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001891.

Bekara F, Herlin C, Somda S, de Runz A, Grolleau JL, Chaput B. Free versus perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: ¿what is the safest coverage? A meta-analysis. Microsurgery. 2018;38(1):109-119. doi:10.1002/micr.30047.

Ota M, Motomiya M, Watanabe N, Shimoda K, Iwasaki N. Clinical outcomes of perforator-based propeller flaps versus free flaps in soft tissue reconstruction for lower leg and foot trauma: a retrospective single-centre comparative study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024;25(1):297. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07433-x.

Abualhaj S, Abualhaj MM, Dawod MS, et al. Reverse sural artery flap for lower extremity reconstruction: a multicenter retrospective analysis of success and failure patterns. J Orthop Traumatol. 2025;26:53. doi:10.1186/s10195-025-00860-z.

Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA, a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

Issue

Section

Artículos de Revisión