Flexible laboratory for testing electrical devices and emulating microgrids

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24054/rcta.v1i45.3477

Keywords:

microgrids emulation, power converters, power laboratory, renewable sources, research and education, storage devices

Abstract

The analysis of the electrical behavior of microgrids including renewable sources, storage devices, nonlinear loads, and traditional components, has a high importance for researching and educating new professionals in energy systems. This paper presents the design and implementation of a flexible laboratory for testing modern electrical devices and emulating real microgrids. The laboratory design begins with the selection of several devices, followed by the structuring and implementation of a bus to connect the devices. The bus includes circuit breakers, contactors, copper bars, a ground connection, PLCs, and safety terminals. The flexible laboratory is experimentally validated by testing a single-phase converter, charging, and discharging three VRLA batteries, replicating a discharge profile and emulating a real microgrid installed on Isla Fuerte, Colombia. The results are used to evaluate the operation of the devices and to analyze the behavior of a real microgrid, demonstrating the usefulness of the laboratory in education and research contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Abedini et al., “Smart microgrid educational laboratory: An integrated electric and communications infrastructure platform,” Scientia Iranica, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2552–2565, 2022, doi: 10.24200/sci.2020.55942.4483.

M. S. Mahdavi, A. Ghasemi, H. Azizi, and G. B. Gharehpetian, “Design and Implementation of a Simple Diesel Generator Emulator for Frequency Analysis of Laboratory-Scale Microgrids,” in 2018 Smart Grid Conference (SGC), 2018, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/SGC.2018.8777811.

A. N. Akpolat, Y. Yang, F. Blaabjerg, E. Dursun, and A. E. Kuzucuoglu, “Design Implementation and Operation of an Education Laboratory-Scale Microgrid,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 57949–57966, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072899.

C. Patrascu, N. Muntean, O. Cornea, and A. Hedes, “Microgrid laboratory for educational and research purposes,” in 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), 2016, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/EEEIC.2016.7555682.

P. C. Kotsampopoulos, V. A. Kleftakis, and N. D. Hatziargyriou, “Laboratory Education of Modern Power Systems Using PHIL Simulation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 3992–4001, 2017, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2633201.

P. E. Pascoe and A. H. Anbuky, “A VRLA battery simulation model,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1015–1041, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.08.014.

V. Svoboda, H. Doering, and J. Garche, “The influence of fast charging on the performance of VRLA batteries,” J Power Sources, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 244–254, 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.026.

“IEEE Standard Test Code for Resistance Measurement,” IEEE Std 118-1978, pp. 1–20, May 1978, doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.1978.80821.

S. Armstrong, M. E. Glavin, and W. G. Hurley, “Comparison of battery charging algorithms for stand alone photovoltaic systems,” in 2008 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2008, pp. 1469–1475. doi: 10.1109/PESC.2008.4592143.

Published

2025-01-01

How to Cite

[1]
A. J. Saavedra Montes, C. Hernández Lenis, and C. A. Ramos Paja, “Flexible laboratory for testing electrical devices and emulating microgrids”, RCTA, vol. 1, no. 45, pp. 216–224, Jan. 2025.

Most read articles by the same author(s)