Work breakdown structures (WBS) in the scope management of software development projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/rcta.v1i39.1375Keywords:
Breakdown Structure of Work, PMBOK, PRINCE 2, software development, agile methodologiesAbstract
The WBS and the WBS dictionary form the baseline of the project's scope and have a hierarchical structure that represents the work to be carried out on the deliverables or tangible results, each of these can be assigned to a specific worker; likewise, it is the input for the development of the schedule. WBS in software projects have clearly demonstrated that this technique can be applied efficiently benefiting project management. As a result of the research, the EDT model is proposed for the Scrum, XP, Scrum / XP, Crystal and Kanban software development methodologies as a tool for IT project managers.
References
Arango Serna, Martin Darío. Campuzano Zapata, Luis Felipe. Zapata Cortes, Julián Andrés. (2015). Mejoramiento de procesos de manufactura utilizando Kanban. Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, vol. 14, No. 27 pp. 221-234 ISSN 1692-3324. Medellín, Colombia. P 221-233
Bordons, M. C. de. (2018). Una comparativa de software gratuitos de gestión de proyectos. Retrieved from https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/88499
Buehring, S. (2020). PRINCE2 vs the PMBOK® Guide | A comparison. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://www.knowledgetrain.co.uk/project-management/pmi/prince2-and-pmbok-guide-comparison
Carrasco Gonzaga, Marcos Klender. Ocampo Pazos, Willian Javier. Ulloa Meneses, Luis Javier. Azcona Esteban, Jon (2019). Metodología híbrida de desarrollo de software combinando XP y SCRUM. Mikarimin. Revista Científica Multidisciplinaria ISSN 2528-7842. P. 109-116.
Castro, V. (2017) pm4dev, 2009 serie de gerencia para el desarrollo Gestión del Cronograma del Proyecto Gerencia de proyectos para organizaciones de desarrollo
Duque Madrid, Nathalia Bibiana y Solórzano Pardo, José Hember (2019). Prácticas y metodologías ágiles en la industria de software en Colombia. Tendencias en la investigación universitaria. Vol. VIII (Una visión desde Latinoamérica) p. 60-72.
Fernandez, K., Garrido, A., Ramírez, Y., & Perdomo, I. (2015). PMBOK y PRINCE 2 similitudes y diferencias -PMBOK and PRINCE 2, similarities and differences. Revista Científica, 3(23), 111. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.RC.2015.23.a9
Gáfaro, R. E. M., Contreras, M. R., & Villamizar, L. A. E. (2017). Gestión de alcance en proyectos de desarrollo de videojuegos. Revista colombiana de tecnologías de avanzada (RCTA), 1(27).
Grünloh, C., Walldius, Å., Hartmann, G., & Gulliksen, J. (2015). Using online reviews as narratives to evoke designer’s empathy. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9296, pp. 298–315). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_22
Haslwanter, J. D., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2017). Why do few assistive technology systems make it to market? The case of the HandyHelper project. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(3), 755–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0499-3
Hedeman, B., & Seegers, R. (2009). PRINCE2TM 2009 Edition-A Pocket Guide. (S. Newton, Ed.) (Van Haren). Van Haren.
Heldman, K. (2018). PMP: project management professional exam study guide. (J. Minatel, Ed.). Indiana: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Helgason, V. (2010). Project scope management. Universityof Reykjavík. Retrieved from https://skemman.is/bitstream/1946/9886/1/M.Sc_CSM_ScopeManagement_VidarHelgason.pdf
Ledoux, J. (2014). Prince2 & PMBOK Comparison Demystified. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://es.slideshare.net/CTESolutions/prince2-pmbok-comparison-demystified-29846454
Montes, J. D., & Pérez, M. D. (2014). Comparación de metodologías de gerencia de proyectos Prince2 y Pmbok5. Retrieved from http://repository.ean.edu.co/handle/10882/7024
Ochoa, J., & Tarazona, G. (2017). Aplicación web para la construcción de edt de proyectos bajo el estándar pmi. Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander.
Pagliari, C. (2007). Design and evaluation in ehealth: Challenges and implications for an interdisciplinary field. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.2.e15
Parada, Carmen & Puentes, M & Vera-Rivera, Fredy. (2018). Study of the use of agile methodologies in the development of software construction projects in Colombia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1126. 012056. 10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012056.
PM4DEV. (2016). PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS. Project Management for Development Organizations. Retrieved from www.pm4dev.com
PMI®, A. (2017). Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 157.
PMI, A. (2013). Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). In Project Management Institute, 5.
Prendi, E., & Barrero, A. (2010). PMBoK vs PRINCE2. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from https://www.slideshare.net/evergreenpm/pmbok-vs-prince2
Sanz, R. (2017). La Gestión del Alcance del Proyecto. Retrieved September 12, 2020, from https://uv-mdap.com/programa-desarrollado/bloque-i-el-ciclo-de-vida-del-proyecto/modulo-3-planificacion-del-proyecto/la-gestion-del-alcance-del-proyecto/
Silva, H & Pérez, Torcoroma & Puentes, M. (2018). Adoption of project management methodologies in Colombia project manager’s perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1126. 012032. 10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012032.
Tausworthe, R. C. (1979). The work breakdown structure in software project management. Journal of Systems and Software, 1, 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(79)90018-9
Taylor, M. D. (2003). How to Develop Work Breakdown Structures. Retrieved from https://cs.anu.edu.au/courses/comp3120/local_docs/readings/HowToDevelopWBS.pdf
Taylor, M. D. (2018). WBS Types (Work Breakdown Structure). Retrieved September 8, 2020, from https://project-management.com/wbs-types-work-breakdown-structure/
Turner, K., & McGee-Lennon, M. (2013). Advances in telecare over the past 10 years. Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth, 1, 21. https://doi.org/10.2147/SHTT.S42674
Downloads
Published
Versions
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE TECNOLOGIAS DE AVANZADA (RCTA)
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Authors retain the moral rights of authorship and grant the journal the right of first publication of the work. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0 DEED), allowing third parties to use the work provided appropriate credit is given to the authors and the first publication in this journal. Commercial use of the work is not permitted, and derivative works cannot be created.
- Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the article (for example, including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided that the work is clearly indicated as having first been published in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., on institutional or personal websites) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and greater and faster dissemination of the published work.