Speech acts as indicators of communicative intention: literature review and analysis

Authors

  • Analia Andrea Trolio University of the Argentine Social Museum
  • Verónica Maggio University of the Argentine Social Museum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24054/rcsf.v11i1.4036

Keywords:

Speech Acts, Pragmatics, Communicative Intent, Child Development, Language Development Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Diagnosis

Abstract

Introduction: Human communication is a complex process that involves not only the transmission of information but also the expression of intentions and actions through speech acts. Developed by J.L. Austin and John Searle, speech acts play a key role in the creation of social relationships and the understanding of communicative intent. This review aims to explore how speech acts can be used as tools to measure communicative intent in clinical and educational contexts, with a particular focus on child development and the early identification of pragmatic difficulties. Materials and Methods: Following the PRISMA model, this review collected studies published between 2010 and 2024 that investigated the use of speech acts as a unit of measurement. The review included theoretical and empirical research focused on the pragmatics of language across various populations. Searches were conducted in databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar using key
terms in both English and Spanish. A qualitative analysis identified patterns in the use of speech acts to assess communicative intent, their relationship with child language development, and their application in the diagnosis of disorders such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). Results: The reviewed studies revealed a consensus on the utility of speech acts as a key diagnostic tool, particularly in child development and the diagnosis of language disorders. The connection between speech acts and cognitive development was emphasized, as well as the importance of
assessing communicative intent in natural contexts. However, some studies did not delve deeply into the practical application of speech acts in therapeutic interventions. Although their diagnostic value is recognized, the potential of speech acts as a foundation for treating pragmatic difficulties remains an area requiring further exploration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tomasello R. Linguistic signs in action: The neuropragmatics of speech acts. Brain Lang. 2023 Jan;236:105203. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105203. Epub 2022 Dec 2. PMID: 36470125; PMCID: PMC9856589.

Adams C. Practitioner review: the assessment of language pragmatics. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;43(8):973-87. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00226. PMID: 12455920.

Carragher M, Mok Z, Steel G, Conroy P, Pettigrove K, Rose ML, Togher L. Towards efficient, ecological assessment of interaction: A scoping review of co-constructed communication. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):831-875. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12957. Epub 2023 Oct 21. PMID: 37864388.

Bara BG, Bosco FM, Bucciarelli M. Developmental pragmatics in normal and abnormal children. Brain Lang. 1999 Jul;68(3):507-28. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2125. PMID: 10441191.

Vogindroukas I, Stankova M, Chelas EN, Proedrou A. Language and Speech Characteristics in Autism. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Oct 14;18:2367-2377. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S331987. PMID: 36268264; PMCID: PMC9578461.

Friedman L, Sterling A. A Review of Language, Executive Function, and Intervention in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Semin Speech Lang. 2019 Aug;40(4):291-304. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692964. Epub 2019 Jul 16. PMID: 31311054; PMCID: PMC7012379.

Maggio V, Abadia C, Jacob A, Vázquez Durrieu D, Solman M. La comunicación preverbal en niños con ausencia del lenguaje. Rev Logop Foniatr Audiol. 2021; doi:10.1016/j.rlfa.2020.10.003.

Rustichelli N. Valoración del componente pragmático a partir de datos orales. Rev Neurol. 2009.

Calderón-Vera LK, Llanos-Redondo M, Ramírez-Betancur AM, Araujo-Medina AL. COVID-19 y el Índice de Desarrollo Humano: reflexiones de una relación relevante. Eco Mat [Internet]. 2022;13(2):118–34. Disponible en: https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/ecomatematico/article/view/4876

Llanos-Redondo A, Mogollon M, Aguilar-Cañas S-J, Bateca-Parada Z-C. Asociaciones entre clase social e hipoacusia laboral. Rev Investig Innov Cienc Salud [Internet]. 2020;2(1):1–14. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S2665-20562020000100001&script=sci_arttext

Abraham MV, Brenca RM. Análisis psicométrico de la evaluación del aspecto pragmático del lenguaje infantil: Batería ICRA-A. Rev Psicol Clín. 2009;18(3):450-9.

Gallardo-Paúls B. Valoración del componente pragmático a partir de datos orales. Rev Logop Foniatr Audiol. 2021.

Peñafiel Puerto M. Indicadores tempranos de los trastornos del lenguaje. Form Act Pediatr Aten Prim. 2012;5(1):40-6.

Published

2025-04-06

How to Cite

Trolio, A. A., & Maggio, V. (2025). Speech acts as indicators of communicative intention: literature review and analysis . REVISTA CIENTÍFICA SIGNOS FÓNICOS, 11(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.24054/rcsf.v11i1.4036