Desafíos en la definición de factores de seguridad en el diseño de estructuras geotécnicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/rcta.v2i40.2354Palabras clave:
Factor de seguridad, estructuras geotécnicas, criterio ingenierilResumen
En este artículo, se analiza y discute la información de una encuesta realizada a un grupo de estudiantes de posgrado en ingeniería civil acerca de cómo el concepto de factor de seguridad es interpretado y empleado en el diseño de estructuras geotécnicas. Los resultados obtenidos aportan a la comprensión de las variables asociadas al cálculo de un factor de seguridad, visto como un ejercicio que trasciende el uso de fórmulas matemáticas e involucra al criterio ingenieril, siendo un aspecto clave al momento de su aplicación en contextos reales.
Descargas
Citas
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2007). LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Cuarta Edición. Washington, D.C.
American Concrete Institute. (2002). Building code requirements for structural concrete. American Concrete Institute (ACI). Detroit.
American Institute of Steel Construction. (2001). Manual of steel construction: Load and resistance factor design. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Tercera Edición. Chicago.
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2000). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE-7 2000. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCI). Reston, Va.
Duncan, J. M. (2000). “Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering”. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 126.
Edmondson V. y Sherratt, F. (2022). “Engineering judgement in undergraduate structural design education: enhancing learning with failure case studies”. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 47, No 4. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2022.2036704
Eurocode (2004). EN 1997-1. Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules.
Fellin, W. (2005). “Assessment of characteristic shear strength parameters of soil and its implication in geotechnical design”. In Analyzing Uncertainty in Civil Engineering. Wolfgang Fellin, Heimo Lessmann, Michael Oberguggenberger, Robert Vieider (Eds.). Springer. Berlin.
Freudenthaal, A. M. (1956). “Safety and the probability of structural failure”. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 121. No. 1.
Freudenthaal, A. M. (1968). Critical appraisal of safety criteria and their basic concepts. IABSE Congress Report, Nueva York. https://www.e-periodica.ch/cntmng?pid=bse-cr-001:1968:8::8
Hansen, J. B. (1956). “Limit design and partial safety factors in soil mechanics”. Danish Geotechnical Institute Bulletin, Vol. 1.
Hansen, J. B. (1965). “The philosophy of foundation design: design criteria, safety factors and settlement limits”. Duke University Symposium on Foundations.
Haurylkiewicz, J. (1979) “Critical analysis of the method of safety factors in geotechnics”. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering, ICASP-3, 2.
Herle, I. (2005). Difficulties related to numerical predictions of deformations. In Analyzing Uncertainty in Civil Engineering. Wolfgang Fellin, Heimo Lessmann, Michael Oberguggenberger, Robert Vieider (Eds.). Springer. Berlin.
Hinze, J. y Gambatese, J. (2003). “Factors That Influence Safety Performance of Specialty Contractors”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 129, No. 2.
Hueckel, S. (1964). "The Problem of Safety in Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering”. Proc. Sem. Sil Mech., Lodz, p. 137
Janbu, N., Bjerrum, L. y Kjaernsli, B. (1956). “Soil mechanics applied to some engineering problems”. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Vol. 16.
Matsuo, M. y Asaoka, A. (1976). “A statistical study on a conventional “Safety Factor Method””. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 16, No. 1.
Meyerhof, G. G. (1970). “Safety factors in soil mechanics”. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 7.
Musto, J. C. (2010). “The safety factor: case studies in engineering judgment”. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, Vol. 38, No. 4.
Naylor, D. (1981). “Quantifying safety”. Ground Engineering, 14(7) 2 and 6.
Nieto Leal, A. Camacho Tauta, J. F. Ruiz Blanco, E. F. (2009). “Determinación de parámetros para los modelos elastoplásticos Mohr-Coulomb y Hardening soil en suelos arcillosos”. Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, Vol. 8, No. 15.
Oberguggenberger, M. (2005). The mathematics of uncertainty: models, methods and interpretations. In Analyzing Uncertainty in Civil Engineering. Wolfgang Fellin, Heimo Lessmann, Michael Oberguggenberger, Robert Vieider (Eds.). Springer. Berlin.
Olarte, M.C. y Ruge, J.C. (2019). Analysis of numerical simulations on triaxial compression tests using different constitutive models of the soil behavior. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1388.
Oliphant, J. (1992). “Controlling the safety of geotechnical structures: a proposed approach”. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 10.
Phoon, K. K. (2017). “Role of reliability calculations in geotechnical design”. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, Vol. 11, No. 1. DOI: 10.1080/17499518.2016.1265653
Pugsley, A. (1955) Report on structural safety, Structural Engineer, 33 (5) 141–149.
Pugsley, A, (1966). The safety of structures. Arnold, London.
Ruge, J.C. (2014). Analysis of the behaviour of pile curtain executed on porous metastable soil through the use of a hypoplastic constitutive model considering the unsaturated response, PhD Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasil,
Ruge, J.C., Cunha, R.P., Colmenares, J.E. y Mendoza, C.C. (2017). “Class A prediction of a retaining structure made by a pile curtain wall executed on a tropical soil”. DYNA, Vol. 84, No. 202.
Smith, G.N. (1985). “The use of probability theory to assess the safety of propped embedded cantilever retaining walls”. Geotechnique, Vol. 35, No. 4.
Taylor, D. W. (1948). Fundamentals of soil mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Terzaghi, K. y Peck, R.B. (1967). Soil mechanics in engineering practice. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Uniandes (2014). Concepto técnico en relación a las causas más probables del colapso del edificio Space, informe final - fase III. Universidad de los Andes, Colombia. https://www.medellin.gov.co/irj/go/km/docs/pccdesign/SubportaldelCiudadano_2/PlandeDesarrollo_0_15/Noticias/Shared%20Content/Documentos/2014/Uniandes_Informe-Final-Fase3-SPACE-Resumen.pdf
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE TECNOLOGIAS DE AVANZADA (RCTA)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.