Design of pedagogical strategies for inclusive teaching about the environment and georesources in basic and secondary education institutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/raaas.v16i1.3798Keywords:
Inclusive teaching, School curriculum, environmental sciences, Geoconservation, Planet EarthAbstract
Concern about environmental problems at a global level has highlighted the importance of adopting inclusive teaching. In view of the various threats that threaten the environment, not only ecosystems are at risk, but also the lives of all beings that share planet Earth. The transfer of knowledge about environmental problems is important to raise awareness about their importance and contribute to their mitigation. Environmental problems often generate controversy and are still little known by the general public. Therefore, the didactic workshops proposed in this work represent a strategy to teach about environmental problems, particularly controversial, without encountering affective barriers to learning. This inclusive initiative targets a great diversity of students in abilities, knowledge and interest in learning, which can contribute to students actively participating in activities that deepen conceptual understanding through a meaningful learning environment. It is essential that geosciences, with their significant impact on society, capture the attention of experts from the Ministry of Education and those responsible for curricular design. The purpose is to achieve its gradual integration into the study plans. This initiative seeks to provide essential support to primary and secondary school teachers, who face the challenge of transmitting geoscientific knowledge effectively. At the same time, it aspires to advise decision makers and citizens on the repercussions of environmental problems on our environment. This project not only aims to address the gap in geoscience teaching, but also to serve as a valuable source of information for decision-making at the government and community levels. The implementation of this initiative will result in the creation of specific activities and materials, designed to enrich the teaching of environmental issues. These will include crucial aspects such as climate change, pollution, deforestation, land degradation, energy management, water scarcity, species extinction and biodiversity loss, as well as effective waste management. Finally, the importance of promoting critical thinking and environmental awareness from the formative stages will be considered. This approach will not only empower students, but will also contribute to the development of future leaders and responsible citizens, committed to sustainability and environmental preservation.
Downloads
References
Alba-Pastor, C. (2019). Diseño universal para el aprendizaje: un modelo teóricopráctico para una educación inclusiva de calidad. Participación Educativa, 6(9), 55–68.
Amaya-Navas, O. (2016). La constitución ecológica de Colombia - 3ra. Edición. Universidad Externado de Colombia. https://publicaciones.uexternado.edu.co/gpd-la-constitucion-ecologica-de-colombia-3ra-edicion-9789587724875.html
Brown, M. T. (2005). Landscape restoration following phosphate mining: 30 years of co-evolution of science, industry and regulation. Ecological Engineering, 24(4), 309–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.014
Carcavilla-Urquí, L., Delvene, G., Díaz-Martínez, E., García-Cortés, A., Lozano, G., Rábano, I., Sánchez, A., & Vegas, J. (2014). Geodiversidad y patrimonio geológico (Edición Parques Nacionales). https://doi.org/NIPO: 474-11-012-3
CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Guidelines: Full-Text Representation: Version 2.0 February.
Corney, G. (1998). Learning to Teach Environmental Issues. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 7(2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382049808667562
Cotton, D. (2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: neutrality and balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880600732306
Díez Villoria, E., & Sánchez Fuentes, S. (2015). Diseño universal para el aprendizaje como metodología docente para atender a la diversidad en la universidad. Aula Abierta, 43(2), 87–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aula.2014.12.002
Dong, H., Song, Y., Chen, T., Zhao, J., & Yu, L. (2014). Geoconservation and geotourism in Luochuan Loess National Geopark, China. Quaternary International, 334–335, 40–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.10.023
Durán-Valsero, J., Pallí i Buxó, L., Palacio, J., Brusi i Belmonte, D., López-Martínez, J., & Vallejo, M. (1998). Geología Ecológica, Geodiversidad, Geoconservación y Patrimonio Geológico: la Declaración de Girona. IV Reunión Nacional de La Comisión de Patrimonio Geológico.
Espada, R., Gallego, M., & González, R. (2019). Diseño universal del aprendizaje e inclusión en la educación básica. Alteridad, 14(2), 207–218.
Fernández, M. B., Muñoz-García, L., González-Acebrón, R., García-Hernández, D., Hontecillas, N., Iglesias-Álvarez, R. W., Fesharaki, O., Salazar-Ramírez, T., Navalpotro, M., Reviejo, A., Sanz, B. R., Moral, G. N. Del, & Ureta-Gil, S. (2014). Ready-to-serve Geology! Portable kits for scientific disclosure to people with functional diversity. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Educ. Res. Innov., Seville, 17–19.
Garavito-González, L. (2006). El origen del patrimonio como política pública en Colombia, y su relevancia para la interpretación de los vínculos entre cultura y naturaleza. Opera, 6(6), 169–187.
Gomez-Ros, J. M., Garcia, G., & Peñas, J. M. (2013). Assessment of restoration success of former metal mining areas after 30 years in a highly polluted Mediterranean mining area: Cartagena-La Unión. Ecological Engineering, 57, 393–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.044
Gosselin, D., Burian, S., Lutz, T., & Maxson, J. (2015). Integrating geoscience into undergraduate education about environment, society, and sustainability using place-based learning: three examples. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(3), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0238-8
Gruenewald, D., & Smith, G. (2008). Place-Based Education in the Global Age: Local Diversity (Routledge (ed.); 1st ed.). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769844
Hose, T. (2008). Towards a history of geotourism: definitions, antecedents and the future. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 300(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP300.5
Huntoon, J., Peach, C., & Hopkins, J. (2005). Geoscience education and diversity: vision for the future and strategies for success. Report of the Second Geoscience Education Working Group, National Science Foundation.
Iozzi, L. A. (1989). What Research Says to the Educator: Part Two: Environmental Education and the Affective Domain. The Journal of Environmental Education, 20(4), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1989.9943033
Kirk, K. (2020). Teaching Environmental Issues and the Affective Domain. Teach the Earth the Portal for Earth Education. https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/affective/environment.html
Lewis, G. M., & Hampton, S. J. (2015). Visualizing volcanic processes in SketchUp: An integrated geo-education tool. Computers & Geosciences, 81, 93–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.05.003
Lotero, J. (2014). Áreas Protegidas territorios para la vida y la paz. Tomo I Áreas protegidas para el desarrollo. Parques Nacionales Naturales de Colombia, 11–23.
Martinez, C. (2019). Propuesta didáctica para trabajar la expresion y comprension oral , la memoria y la creatividad a través de los cuentos en Educación Infantil. Publicaciones Didacticas, 102, 421–424. https://publicacionesdidacticas.com/hemeroteca/articulo/102123/articulo-pdf
Mata-Perelló, J., & Mata-Lleonart, R. (2010). Geología social: una nueva perspectiva de la geología y del patrimonio geológico. In Introducción al conocimiento del patrimonio geológico y minero de Bolivia: libro de actas del primer congreso internacional sobre patrimonio geológico y minero de Bolivia y de los andes: Oruro, Bolivia, septiembre del 2010 (Issue 1, pp. 179–188). http://www.sedpgym.es/18-publicaciones/actas-congresos/71-libro-de-actas-del-i-congreso-internacional-sobre-patrimonio-geologico-y-minero-de-bolivia-y-los-andes-oruro-bolivia-2010
Medina, W., Vejsbjerg, L., & Aceñolaza, G. (2016). Marco legal de la geoconservación. Presencia de la geología en las leyes de áreas protegidas de la República Argentina. Revista Del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Nueva Serie, 18(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.22179/REVMACN.18.436
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2013). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice.
Mi, J., Liu, R., Zhang, S., Hou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, F., & Zhang, L. (2019). Vegetation patterns on a landslide after five years of natural restoration in the Loess Plateau mining area in China. Ecological Engineering, 136, 46–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.05.022
Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2006). Estándares Básicos de Competencias en Lenguaje, Matemáticas, Ciencias y Ciudadanas. Guía sobre lo que los estudiantes deben saber y saber hacer con lo que aprenden (Ministerio de Educación Nacional (ed.); Primera ed). https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles-340021_recurso_1.pdf
Ospina, M. (2008). Manual para la delimitación y zonificación de zonas amortiguadoras.
Patzak, M., & Eder, W. (1998). “UNESCO GEOPARK” A new Programme - A new UNESCO label. Geologica Balcanica, 28(3–4), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.52321/geolbalc.28.3-4.33
Pedrinaci, E. (2013). Alfabetización en Ciencias de la Tierra y competencia científica. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias de La Tierra, 21(2), 208–214. http://www.21stcenturyscience.org/
Prados-García, C. (2023). El ingreso involuntario en el contexto de los derechos fundamentales de las personas con discapacidad. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.5076277.6
Rivarosa, A., & Perales, J. (2006). La resolución de problemas ambientales en la escuela y en la formación inicial de maestros. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 40(2006), 111–124. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles-340021_recurso_1.pdf
Ruiz, O., Thomson, B., Cerrato, J. M., & Rodriguez-Freire, L. (2019). Groundwater restoration following in-situ recovery (ISR) mining of uranium. Applied Geochemistry, 109, 104418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104418
Schweizer, D. M., & and Kelly, G. J. (2005). An Investigation of Student Engagement in a Global Warming Debate. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.1.75
Semken, S. (2012). Place-Based Teaching and Learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_1739
Serrano-Ruíz, C., Ramírez-Ramírez, C., Abril-Miranda, J., Ramón-Camargo, L., Guerra-Urquijo, L., & Clavijo-González, N. (2013). Barreras contextuales para la participación de las personas con discapacidad física. Salud UIS, 45(1), 41–51.
Sleeter, Christine E. (2001). Preparing Teachers for Culturally Diverse Schools: Research and the Overwhelming Presence of Whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487101052002002
Stewart, I. S., & Gill, J. C. (2017). Social geology — integrating sustainability concepts into Earth sciences. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 128(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2017.01.002
Villegas, H. (2005). El Conocimiento Geológico y su función social. X Congreso Colombiano de Geología.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 REVISTA AMBIENTAL AGUA, AIRE Y SUELO

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.