Regionalization of avocado production in the state of Michoacán, considering the productive disparities in the region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/cyta.v7i2.2816Keywords:
Yield, average rural price, productive areas, competitiveness, harvested areaAbstract
The avocado production has experienced a notable growth in recent years in Michoacán, consolidating itself as the main producer at the national level and one of the main exporters worldwide. However, marked disparities were observed between regions and municipalities in terms of productivity and performance levels. Given this scenario, there was a need to design strategies that would better exploit the productive potential of each area, compensating for limitations and promoting comparative advantages. The research aimed to address the question: How could a productive regionalization be designed to maximize the comparative advantages of each area in terms of surface area, yield, price, and productivity, compensating for their limitations and disparities, to optimize the global avocado production in Michoacán? The general objective was to propose a regionalization of avocado production in Michoacán, considering the productive disparities between regions. To achieve this, three specific objectives were outlined: to examine the evolution of indicators such as yield, harvested area, and rural average price of avocado in the main producing municipalities of Michoacán between 2010 and 2021; to compare the performance between these municipalities in the mentioned variables; and to identify possible explanatory factors of the productive leadership of some areas, considering comparative and competitive advantages. The methodology was based on a statistical analysis of the indicators using official data. Synthetic indicators were constructed, and regionalization techniques were applied to identify areas with homogeneous characteristics. The results allowed for the characterization of regions, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement. Differentiated strategies were defined by enhancing capacities, investing in lagging areas, and promoting regional complementarity. The proposal was an integral regionalization that, respecting productive vocations, allowed for the pooling of efforts and compensation of disparities to optimize the production of the Michoacán avocado sector.
Downloads
References
FAOSTAT. (2022). Estadísticas Agrícolas de la FAO. Rome, Italy. Recuperado de http://www.fao.org/faostat/es/#data
Hernández Bernal, M. N., Rodríguez Delgado, J. A., & Cruz Cortés, D. F. (2018). El aguacate y su expansión internacional. Economía Agraria y recursos naturales, 18(1), 107-126. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/econagraria/article/view/25003
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjc88g2
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). Macmillan.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
Martínez, A. (2016). Análisis del cluster aguacatero en Michoacán. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios, 38, 1298-1311. https://revista.cmro.org.mx/index.php/rdm/article/view/224
Ortega, D. (2019). Impactos económicos territoriales del cultivo del aguacate en el municipio de Tancítaro, Michoacán. Tesis de Maestría. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. http://www.buap.mx/investigacion/tesis/00001456.pdf
Ortega, R. (2019). Michoacán: Disparidades regionales en el sector aguacatero. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 23(3), 703-718. https://cienciasagricolas.inifap.gob.mx/editorial/index.php/remexca/article/view/875
Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de pôle de croissance. Économie appliquée, 7(1-2), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecap.1955.1058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoap.1955.2522
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1990/03/thecompetitive-advantageof-nations DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
Ramírez, J. et al. (2018). Competitividad del aguacate mexicano en el mercado mundial. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios, 43, 1210-1226. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/141/14160302013/
Ramírez, N. B., Rodríguez, L. G., Bello, G. A., Valadez, J.M. C., Ortiz, L. D. E., y Hernández, N. G. (2018). Incidencia económica del cultivo y producción del aguacate en México. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios, 22(43), 866-877. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=428554711013
Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray.
Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera [SIACON]. (2022). Datos de producción de aguacate en México 2010-2021 [Conjunto de datos]. Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/siacon
Sistema de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera [SIAP]. (2022). Datos de superficie cosechada de aguacate en México 1980 [Conjunto de datos]. Recuperado de https://www.gob.mx/siap
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Carlos G. Díaz, Óscar I. Reyes, Hugo H. Gamboa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.