Desafíos en la enseñanza de ingeniería en el siglo XXI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/rcta.v1i41.2416Palabras clave:
Educación, ingeniería, siglo XXIResumen
Los programas de ingeniería tienen un papel crucial que desempeñar para que la formación de los futuros ingenieros sea exitosa y se adapten a las necesidades de la sociedad del siglo XXI. A través de la revisión bibliográfica, el diálogo con actores de la academia, la industria y entes gubernamentales se identificaron unos tópicos fundamentales que los programas de ingeniería deben constantemente monitorear para adaptar sus currículos, métodos de enseñanza, procesos de admisión y retención de estudiantes. Dentro estos tópicos se destacan: los rápidos cambios en el mercado laboral, avances tecnológicos en educación y la creciente necesidad de diversidad e inclusión. Para hacer frente a estos retos, la enseñanza de la ingeniería debe ser más adaptable, receptiva e integradora, y centrarse en el desarrollo de las competencias más demandadas en el mercado laboral, un aprendizaje más práctico y basado en proyectos, enfoques interdisciplinarios, competencias interpersonales y elementos éticos y sociales
Citas
Abd-Elwahed, M. S., & Al-Bahi, A. M. (2021). Sustainability awareness in engineering curriculum through a proposed teaching and assessment framework. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(3), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09567-0
Ahmed, F., Capretz, L. F., & Campbell, P. (2012). Evaluating the Demand for Soft Skills in Software Development. IT Professional, 14(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2012.7
BISSELL, C., & BENNETT, S. (1997). The Role of the History of Technology in the Engineering Curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799708923459
Cardoso, M., & Chanin, R. M. (2022). The history of Engineering Education: learning from the past to design the future . Research, Society and Development, 11(11 SE-), e364111133606. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i11.33606
Constantinides, E., & Zinck Stagno, M. C. (2011). Potential of the social media as instruments of higher education marketing: a segmentation study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2011.573593
Coskun, S., & Gencay, E. (2019). Adapting Engineering Education to Industry 4.0 Vision. In Technologies (Vol. 7, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies7010010
Diekman, A. B., Weisgram, E. S., & Belanger, A. L. (2015). New Routes to Recruiting and Retaining Women in STEM: Policy Implications of a Communal Goal Congruity Perspective. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12010
Direito, I., Pereira, A., & Duarte, A. M. de O. (2012). Engineering Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Soft Skills: Relations with Self-Efficacy and Learning Styles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 843–851. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.571
Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.895703
Friedel, R. (1986). Engineering in the 20th Century. Technology and Culture, 27(4), 669–673. https://doi.org/10.2307/3105321
Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190167
Grimson, J. (2002). Re-engineering the curriculum for the 21st century. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790110100803
Guntzburger, Y., Pauchant, T. C., & Tanguy, P. A. (2017). Ethical Risk Management Education in Engineering: A Systematic Review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(2), 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9777-y
Hall, C. W., Kauffmann, P. J., Wuensch, K. L., Swart, W. E., DeUrquidi, K. A., Griffin, O. H., & Duncan, C. S. (2015). Aptitude and Personality Traits in Retention of Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 104(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20072
Hammond, G. P. (2004). Engineering sustainability: thermodynamics, energy systems, and the environment. International Journal of Energy Research, 28(7), 613–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/er.988
Judson, E., Ernzen, J., Chen, Y.-C., Krause, S., Middleton, J., & Culbertson, R. (2015). What is the effect of establishing programs that address sense of belonging on undergraduate engineering retention? 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344202
Kaminski, W., Marszalek, J., & Ciolkowska, A. (2008). Renewable energy source—Dehydrated ethanol. Chemical Engineering Journal, 135(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.03.017
Karim, M. S. A. (2016). Entrepreneurship Education in an Engineering Curriculum. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 379–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00047-2
Li, K. F., Zielinski, A., & Gebali, F. (2012). Capstone team design projects in engineering curriculum: Content and management. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) 2012, T1C-1-T1C-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360372
Lucena, J. C. (2003). Flexible Engineers: History, Challenges, and Opportunities for Engineering Education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(6), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467603259875
Martin, J. P., Simmons, D. R., & Yu, S. L. (2013). The Role of Social Capital in the Experiences of Hispanic Women Engineering Majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20010
Maton, K. I., Pollard, S. A., McDougall Weise, T. V, & Hrabowski, F. A. (2012). Meyerhoff Scholars Program: A Strengths-Based, Institution-Wide Approach to Increasing Diversity in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine, 79(5), 610–623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.21341
McGowan, A. H. (2013). Teaching Science and Ethics to Undergraduates: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9338-3
Moakler Jr., M. W., & Kim, M. M. (2014). College Major Choice in STEM: Revisiting Confidence and Demographic Factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00075.x
Owusu, P. A., & Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. (2016). A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering, 3(1), 1167990. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990
Ozadowicz, A. (2020). Modified Blended Learning in Engineering Higher Education during the COVID-19 Lockdown—Building Automation Courses Case Study. In Education Sciences (Vol. 10, Issue 10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100292
Picon, A. (2004). Engineers and engineering history: problems and perspectives. History and Technology, 20(4), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/0734151042000304367
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrovic, V. M., & Jovanovic, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
Rao, M. S. (2014). Enhancing employability in engineering and management students through soft skills. Industrial and Commercial Training, 46(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-04-2013-0023
Salazar-Fernandez, J. P., Sepúlveda, M., & Munoz-Gama, J. (2019). Influence of Student Diversity on Educational Trajectories in Engineering High-Failure Rate Courses that Lead to Late Dropout. 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725143
Sari, R. C., Warsono, S., Ratmono, D., Zuhrohtun, Z., & Hermawan, H. D. (2021). The effectiveness of teaching virtual reality-based business ethics: is it really suitable for all learning styles? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2021-0084
Schipper, M., & Stappen, E. van der. (2018). Motivation and attitude of computer engineering students toward soft skills. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363231
Secundo, G., Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2012). Student diversity in engineering education: Insights to build a glocal program. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2012.6201143
Shahabadkar, P. K., Vispute, P. S., & Nandurkar, K. N. (2015). Soft Skills Training Through Cooperative Learning: A Case Study BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (R. Natarajan (ed.); p. 573). Springer India.
Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 842–867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
Stephanopoulos, G., & Reklaitis, G. V. (2011). Process systems engineering: From Solvay to modern bio- and nanotechnology.: A history of development, successes and prospects for the future. Chemical Engineering Science, 66(19), 4272–4306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.05.049
Sydorenko, V. (2020). Soft skills as an educational trend and a necessary development component for a vocational lifelong education teacher. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 38(2 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2020.2.23
Vo, H.-P., Berglund, A., & Daniels, M. (2017). A Perspective from Vietnamese Students on Teaching of Soft Skills. 2017 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE), 23–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2017.11
Waizmann, B., Schuhbauer, H., & Brockmann, P. (2020). Smart Technology to Improve Cultural and Gender Diversity in Engineering Education. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125350
Williams, S. A., Lutz, B., Hampton, C., Matusovich, H. M., & Lee, W. C. (2016). Exploring student motivation towards diversity education in engineering. 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757565
Descargas
Publicado
Versiones
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE TECNOLOGIAS DE AVANZADA (RCTA)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los autores que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
-
Los autores conservan los derechos morales de autor y otorgan a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación del trabajo. Este trabajo se licencia bajo la Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0 DEED), que permite a terceros utilizar el trabajo siempre que se dé crédito adecuado a los autores y a la primera publicación en esta revista. No se permite el uso comercial de la obra y no se pueden crear obras derivadas.
-
Los autores pueden celebrar acuerdos contractuales adicionales e independientes para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo, incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), siempre que se indique claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
-
Se permite y se recomienda a los autores publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo, en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado.
