Ethical Publishing Standards

Journal of Basic Health Sciences (CBS)

The Journal of Basic Health Sciences (CBS) promotes the adoption of exemplary practices based on ethical publishing standards among all collaborators, aligning with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Consequently, we advocate for maximum rigor in both the evaluation and publication process, following the principles of exemplary ethical behavior by all parties involved in the editorial process: author, journal editor, reviewer, and publisher.

In the CBS Journal, each submitted article is evaluated and published based on its scientific merits and contributions, ensuring the implementation of the most appropriate practices at each stage of the publication process. A thorough review of manuscripts is conducted to detect potential cases of plagiarism using the Turnitin tool. Furthermore, each article submitted for publication must meet the following requirements:

  • Consent: All authors grant their consent for the submission and publication of the article under evaluation.
  • Work Originality: The submitted article is original, has not been previously published, and has not been simultaneously submitted for evaluation to another journal.
  • Consent to Reproduce Work: The article does not include original material copied from other authors without their consent, and in case of using material from other authors, their consent for printed and electronic reproduction must be clearly indicated.
  • Previous Research: All information derived from previous studies included in the article under review is properly referenced. If it is an analysis of a previously published proposal, it must be adequately cited.
  • Journal Archives: The article under review will be preserved in the CBS Journal archives and considered a valid publication provided it meets each of the above criteria.
  • Review Committee: Members of the Review Committee maintain no relationship, whether professional, academic, or personal, with the authors.

1. Research Integrity

1.1. Research Misconduct

Research misconduct encompasses fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. If the Editorial Committee detects signs of such conduct, it will initiate an investigation by requesting the collaboration of the supporting institution, employer, sponsor, or competent national entity.

1.2. Reporting Irregularities

Reports of research irregularities, submitted by identified individuals or anonymously, will be investigated only if accompanied by corresponding evidence.

1.3. Fabrication/Falsification and Image Manipulation

Although image editing is sometimes required to highlight certain features, inappropriate manipulation can lead to misleading results. Researchers must report any image editing, following these recommendations: specific features should not be altered, original and unedited images should be presented alongside any modifications intended for publication. Brightness or contrast adjustments are only acceptable when applied uniformly to the entire image without distorting its meaning.

1.4. Plagiarism

Plagiarism, which involves copying or misusing another person's intellectual property, is strictly prohibited. The Journal of Basic Health Sciences (CBS) conducts a thorough plagiarism review on all manuscripts.

1.5. Duplicate and Redundant Data Publication

Researchers should avoid publishing previously disclosed data as original. The re-edition or republication of data is permitted provided it is done with due acknowledgment.

2. Editorial Standards and Processes

2.1. Authorship

  • The sequence of authors should adequately reflect scientific or professional contributions.
  • All authors must sign an authorization, indicating their level of participation.
  • Contributions not meeting authorship criteria should be listed in the acknowledgments with permission.

2.2. Peer Review

The Journal uses a double-blind review system for all submitted articles. The editorial section is not subject to peer review.

2.3. Conflict of Interest

Editors, authors, and reviewers must disclose any conflict of interest that could affect their ability to submit or review a manuscript objectively.

3. Handling Reports, Complaints, and Appeals

The Journal of Basic Health Sciences (CBS) is committed to receiving reports, complaints, and appeals via email at cbs@unipamplona.edu.co. These will be managed by the Editor-in-Chief and handled with the utmost confidentiality to preserve the anonymity of the complainant.

The Journal maintains rigorous ethical editorial control and follows the protocol established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to address alleged misconduct.

4. Authors' Obligations

  • Sources of Information: Authors must present procedures and calculations in detail in their articles.
  • Originality and Plagiarism: Proper citation of authors, contributors, and sources is essential.
  • Redundant or Concurrent Publication: Authors should avoid publishing essentially identical manuscripts in more than one journal.
  • Similarity Analysis: The CBS Journal uses the Turnitin tool to detect plagiarism.

5. Editor's Obligations

  • Publication Decision: The Editor decides which articles will be published based on reviewers' reports.
  • Fair Play: Evaluations are conducted without bias regarding race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnic origin, or political views.
  • Peer Review: Ensures a fair, impartial, and timely review process.

6. Reviewers' Obligations

  • Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Blind peer review is essential for editorial decision-making.
  • Punctuality: Reviewers must notify if they cannot complete the review within the established deadline.
  • Objectivity Standards: The review should be conducted objectively, avoiding personal criticism.