Review Procedure

The Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences Journal (FACE) applies a rigorous editorial process aimed at ensuring the scientific quality, originality, and academic integrity of submitted manuscripts. All contributions are evaluated through editorial and scientific procedures that guarantee transparency, objectivity, and academic relevance.

1. Manuscript Submission

Authors must submit their manuscripts through the journal's editorial platform, using the official templates established by the Faculty of Economic and Business Sciences Journal (FACE) and complying with the submission guidelines defined for each article type.

---

2. Initial Review

The Editorial Committee conducts a preliminary review to verify that the manuscript meets the following requirements:

• Alignment with the thematic areas of economic and business sciences.
• Compliance with editorial guidelines and formatting requirements.
• Submission of all required documentation.
• Preliminary originality verification through Turnitin.

Manuscripts that do not meet the basic editorial requirements may be returned to the authors for revision or rejected at this initial stage.

---

3. Ethical Evaluation

The journal verifies that manuscripts comply with the ethical principles of scientific publishing, including:

• Absence of plagiarism and self-plagiarism.
• Respect for copyright regulations.
• Proper use of citations and bibliographic references.
• Disclosure of conflicts of interest when applicable.
• Compliance with academic and scientific integrity principles.

---

4. Peer Review Process

Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial editorial review will be submitted for external evaluation through a double-blind peer review system, ensuring the anonymity of both authors and reviewers.

Specialized reviewers will evaluate the manuscript considering:

• Scientific and academic quality.
• Originality and contribution to knowledge.
• Thematic relevance.
• Methodological rigor.
• Clarity of presentation and argumentative structure.

---

5. Evaluation Outcomes

Upon completion of the peer-review process, authors will receive one of the following editorial decisions:

• Minor Revisions Required: The manuscript requires minor modifications before publication.
• Major Revisions Required: The manuscript requires substantial modifications and a new round of evaluation.
• Accepted: The manuscript is approved without modifications.
• Rejected: The manuscript is not accepted for publication.

---

6. Editorial Decision

Based on the recommendations provided by the external reviewers, the Editor and the Editorial Committee will make a final decision regarding the manuscript:

• Acceptance for publication.
• Request for additional revisions.
• Reasoned rejection.

---

7. Evaluation Criteria

Manuscripts are assessed according to standardized academic criteria:

• Clarity, coherence, and organization of the content.
• Relevance and currency of bibliographic references.
• Originality and innovation of the proposal.
• Contribution to the advancement of economic and business sciences.
• Potential impact on academic and social contexts.

---

8. Final Approval

Once the reviewers' comments have been addressed and the corresponding revisions verified, the Editorial Committee will issue the final approval of the manuscript for publication.

---

9. Final Review and Publication

Approved manuscripts will enter the final editorial production phase, which includes:

• Language editing and proofreading.
• Layout design and typesetting.
• Metadata and reference verification.
• DOI assignment.
• Electronic publication on the journal's OJS platform.

---

10. Authors' Responsibilities

Authors are responsible for:

• The accuracy and originality of the information presented.
• Obtaining the necessary permissions for the use of copyrighted materials.
• Promptly disclosing any conflicts of interest.
• Addressing editorial observations within the established deadlines.
• Complying with ethical principles and good practices in scientific publishing.