Impact of teaching methods and support measures on the development of creative thinking in primary school students.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24054/hutecedu.v2i2.4650Keywords:
Class organization, Scaffolding, Pedagogical innovation, Learning activities, Teaching styles, educational strategies. (Source: ERIC)Abstract
This reflective article discusses the influence of teaching and supporting strategies on the emergence of creative thinking in primary school students through a review of the strategies’ focus. The reviewed works prove that the strategies of problem-based learning, project-based learning, constructivism, metacreative pedagogy, advance organizers, computational thinking, and cognitive tools can be applied to foster different aspects of fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration of creative thinking. Moreover, the cultural, cognitive, and personal characteristics of students and the need for a participatory, discovery-based, idea-oriented, and problem-solving educational environment are taken into account. From the perspective of reflection, the primary school teachers may note the necessity to change their traditional practices to make the pedagogical process more active, flexible, and personalized. In such a case, the teachers are considered to be guides and facilitators of students’ creative thinking development who provide the learners with the material, resources, questions, interactions, and opportunities to build their own understanding and express their ideas. Therefore, developing such aspects of creative thinking as flexibility, fluency, originality, and elaboration requires the teachers’ special attention, profound practical implementation of the strategies, and the corresponding evaluation to measure the students’ progress and actualize the following pedagogical interventions.
References
Aoonlamai, N., & Kwangmuang, P. (2025). Integrating digital tools and constructivist learning: a ubiquitous learning framework for enhancing creativity in music education. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 1064. doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03300-z
Aulia Silvina, A., Nugroho Prasetya, A., & Habibah Khusna, B. (2025). Enhancing physics learning with Advance Organizer: A meta-cognitive approach. KONSTAN - JURNAL FISIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN FISIKA, 10(01), 14–22. doi:10.20414/konstan.v10i01.641
Aziz, A. R. (2025). The impact of Ausubel’s theory on developing art skills among art education students: “elements of art” as a model. Fnon Al-Rafidayn Journal, 2(2), 135–150. doi:10.33899/frj.v2i2.61708
Bilier, O., & Vasko, O. (2023). Model of the development of creative thinking primary school students in the process of extracurricular work. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 10(1), 144–151. doi:10.15330/jpnu.10.1.144-151
Ghudkam, S., Chatwattana, P., & Piriyasurawong, P. (2023). An imagineering learning model using advance organizers with internet of things. Higher Education Studies, 13(2), 128. doi:10.5539/hes.v13n2p128
Juliani, A., Permanasari, A., & Patras, Y. E. (2024). Enhancing creative thinking and global diversity through culturally responsive teaching in primary schools. Al-Ishlah, 16(3), 3248–3262. doi:10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5352
Kuatovna, M. N. (2025). Developing continuous creative thinking in schoolchildren. Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement, 2(6), 259–263. doi:10.61796/ejheaa.v2i6.1324
Muriharti, L., Sutarja, M. C., Ahied, M., Wahyuni, E. A., & Hadi, W. P. (2024). The effect of mind mapping based Advance Organizer learning model on students’ creative thinking ability. Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains, 8(1), 13. doi:10.17977/um033v8i1p13-21
Noorkholisoh, L., Yustiana, Y. R., Budiman, N., & Suryana, D. (2024). Validity and reliability analysis using the Rasch Model in developing creativity tests instruments for elementary school students. Jurnal Ilmiah Bimbingan Konseling Undiksha, 15(1), 128–135. doi:10.23887/jibk.v15i1.81249
Nurhasanah, A., Ramadhanti, S., Utami, S., & Putri, F. A. (2022). Improving elementary school students’ understanding of the concept through meaningful learning in David ausbel’s perspective. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 5728–5734. doi:10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.2935
Nurramadhani, A., Patras, Y. E., Ghani, R. A., Anggraeni, R. C., & Sisworo, A. F. (2025). Culturally responsive teaching approach: Does it could enhance elementary students’ creative thinking skills in mathematics learning? Jurnal ilmiah sekolah dasar, 9(2), 382–389. doi:10.23887/jisd.v9i2.97250
Paz-Baruch, N., Grovas, G., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2025). The effects of meta-creative pedagogy on elementary school students’ creative thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 20(1). doi:10.1007/s11409-025-09412-6
Raeisoon, M., Raeisi, M., & Mohammadi, Y. (2024). Effect of using the constructivist teaching method on creative thinking and entrepreneurship. Health Technology Assessment in Action. doi:10.18502/htaa.v8i1.15029
Rao, X., He, X., Wu, J., & Jiao, L. (2025). The relationship between teaching style and student creativity in primary schools. Psychology in the Schools, 62(8), 2390–2397. doi:10.1002/pits.23472
Sosna, T., Vochozka, V., Serý, M., & Blazek, J. (2025). Developing pupils’ creativity through 3D modeling: an experimental study. Frontiers in Education, 10(1583877). doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1583877
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Humanidades, Tecnología y Educación

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





