The Invasion of the Mind: Neuroscience, Neurodata, and the Digital Rights Crisis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24054/ripcs.v4i2.4306

Keywords:

Neurorights, Mental privacy, Neuroscience, Digital rights, Neurotechnology

Abstract

The rapid advancement of neurotechnology, including Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) and neurodata mining, has opened a critical new frontier for Human Rights. This article presents an extensive bibliographic review on the emergence of the so-called neurorights as a response to the potential infringement of mental privacy, personal identity, and free will in the digital age.  The research examines the impact of the mass collection of brain data by consumer and medical devices, highlighting the insufficiency of existing data protection regulatory frameworks (such as the European GDPR) to address the intrinsically sensitive nature of neurocognitive information. The proposal for specific neurorights (mental privacy, personal identity, free will, equitable access) and the ongoing academic and legislative debate, especially in pioneering countries like Chile, is discussed. Conclusions emphasize the urgent need to adapt the law in light of neuroscientific discoveries to preserve human dignity and autonomy in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

References

Congreso Nacional de Chile. (2021). Ley 21.383: Modifica la Constitución Política de la República, para establecer la protección de la actividad cerebral y la información que emana de ella. Diario Oficial de la República de Chile.

Farahany, N. A. (2021). The right to cognitive liberty. The American Journal of Bioethics, 21(4), 1-22.

Lenca, M., & Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13(1), 5.

Lavazza, A. (2018). Neurotechnologies and human rights: How the current legal framework is inadequate to protect our cognitive liberty. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 28(1), 1-22.

Lavazza, A. (2018). Neurotechnologies and human rights: How the current legal framework is inadequate to protect our cognitive liberty. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 28(1), 1–22.

Yuste, R., Goering, S., Arcas, B. A., Bi, G., Carmena, J. M., Carter, A., ... & Wolpaw, J. (2017).

Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature, 551(7679), 159-163.

Yuste, R., Goering, S., Arcas, B. A., Bi, G., Carmena, J. M., Carter, A., ... & Wolpaw, J. (2017). Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature, 551(7679), 159–163.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-03

Issue

Section

Artículos

How to Cite

The Invasion of the Mind: Neuroscience, Neurodata, and the Digital Rights Crisis. (2025). Revista Investigación & Praxis En CS Sociales, 4(2), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.24054/ripcs.v4i2.4306