62
ISSN Electrónico: 2500-9338
Volumen 25-1
Año 2025
Págs. 6293
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between
Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
1
Enlace ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7425-3775
Fecha de Recepción: 10 de Octubre, 2024
Fecha de Aprobación: 15 de Enero, 2025
Fecha de Publicación: 19 de Febrero, 2025
Abstract:
Generation Z, also known as ‘post millennials’ or ‘centennials’, is the group of people born between 1995-
2010. The objective of this research is to analyze and compare the different demands or requirements that
this generation has when selecting a job for centennials in Colombia and Peru. The statistical analysis used
was: Hierarchical Cluster, Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling and Cluster k-means. An online survey was
applied. Some of the main findings are: for centennials in Colombia value professional development more in
a competitive context, while Peru leans towards topics such as innovation, social responsibility, values, long-
term vision of the leader and intelligence, considering a more human in the world of work. Companies want
to hire young people who belong to Generation Z but they do not stay long in the companies because their
expectations are not understood by employers, this research will help companies understand this generation
and their desires and expectations when they select a company to work for and deliver all their knowledge.
Classification JEL: D21, E24, J20
Key Words: Centennials, Generations Z, Workplace
1
Doctor in Strategic Business Administration, DBA (double degree) CENTRUM Graduate Business School Pontifical Catholic University of Peru and Maastricht
School of Management of the Netherlands, 2020 (Double degree in Latin America and Europe). Master of Philosophy. Maastricht School of Management in the
Netherlands. Masters in international business and international Relations. Macquarie University, Australia. Master of Business Administration
Executive MBA. University of the Andes, Colombia. Systems Engineer. Catholic University, Colombia. Docente vinculado a la Universidad Tecnológico de Monterrey-
Mexico. Contacto: daniel.herrera@tec.mx
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
63
Centennials o Generaciones Z y sus exigencias para elegir lugar de trabajo: Estudio comparativo
entre Colombia y Perú
Resumen:
La Generación Z, también conocida como 'post millennials' o 'centennials', es el grupo de personas nacidas
entre 1995-2010. El objetivo de esta investigación es analizar y comparar las diferentes demandas o
requerimientos que tiene esta generación a la hora de seleccionar un trabajo para los generación Z en
Colombia y Perú. Los análisis estadísticos utilizados fueron: Conglomerado Jerárquico, Escalamiento
Multidimensional No Métrico y Conglomerado k-medias. Se aplicó una encuesta en línea. Algunos de los
principales hallazgos son: para los generación Z en Colombia es que valoran más el desarrollo profesional
mientras que Perú se inclina hacia temas como innovación, responsabilidad social, valores, visión de largo
plazo del líder e inteligencia. Las empresas quieren contratar jóvenes que pertenecen a la generación Z pero
ellos no permanecen largo tiempo en las empresas porque sus expectativas no son comprendidas por los
empleadores, esta investigación ayudará a las empresas a entender a esta generación y sus deseos y
expectativas cuando ellos seleccionan una empresa para trabajar y entregar todo su conocimiento.
Palabras clave: Centennials, Generacion Z, Lugar de trabajo, D21, E24, J20
Keywords. Investment, Argentina, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP).
Centennials ou Geração Z e as suas exigências na escolha do local de trabalho: Um estudo
comparativo entre a Colômbia e o Peru
Resumo:
A Geração Z, também conhecida como “pós-millennials” ou “centennials”, é o grupo de pessoas nascidas
entre 1995-2010. O objetivo desta investigação é analisar e comparar as diferentes exigências ou requisitos
que esta geração tem ao selecionar um emprego para a Geração Z na Colômbia e no Peru. As análises
estatísticas utilizadas foram: Hierarchical Clustering, Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling e k-means
Clustering. Foi aplicado um inquérito em linha. Algumas das principais conclusões são: para a geração Z na
Colômbia, valorizam mais o desenvolvimento profissional, enquanto o Peru está mais inclinado a temas como
inovação, responsabilidade social, valores, visão de longo prazo do líder e inteligência. As empresas querem
contratar jovens pertencentes à geração Z, mas estes não permanecem muito tempo nas empresas porque
as suas expectativas não são compreendidas pelos empregadores. Esta investigação ajudará as empresas
a compreender esta geração e os seus desejos e expectativas no momento de selecionar uma empresa para
trabalhar e entregar todo o seu conhecimento.
Palavras-chave: Centennials, Geração Z, Local de trabalho, D21, E24, J20
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
64
1. INTRODUCTION
Generation Z, or centennials, are the age group that
precedes millennials. This generation are those born
after 1995 and represent 25.9% of the world population
(Ruperti-Lucero et al., 2019), which positions them as
the generation with the largest population on the planet.
Generation Z developed in a fully global and
modernized period, where the internet was
incorporated as well as great technological and
telecommunications advances and they are known as
digital natives (Linne, 2014). Among the trends of
Generation Z, there are the digital, work and social
environments that are subject to significant changes.
From this, it is possible to understand the constant
changes that Generation Z and companies present
today when facing the new expectations and current
labor trends that this generation presents.
Gen Z work environment expectations and
preferences are different between past generations
and even between the same members of the
generations. Generation Z is looking for a work
environment where they are given priority and the
opportunity to develop their professional career, an
optimal work environment, good financial security and
a space between work and social life. These demands
are important for organizations to develop attractive
work environments for Generation Z because other
generations have other expectations of the workplace
(Pauli, Guadagnin, & Ruffatto, 2020).
For Generation Z, the demands and
characteristics of the company where they will work are
important when making the decision to work. These
demands and characteristics translate into challenges
for companies because they must propose these
aspects to attract this workforce. Currently, for
example, working at home has become very common
for Centennials, due to the different changes in the
environment and in society, about 70% of employees
between 20 and 25 years old want to telework
(Galeano, 2020). It is also important to emphasize the
importance of health at work because approximately
11% of the Centennial population experience
neurological disorders, especially with regard to
migraines (Herrero, Ramírez, Barbero & Ruiz de la
Torre, 2021). The expectations regarding an ideal
place to work are the most important aspects to assess
in this research. In fact, Filipuzzi (2016) identified
through a survey the job expectations of Generation Z,
the most important finding being that these young
people belonging to Generation Z seek a job according
to their personality, in addition, that progress within the
organization should be quick. Likewise, for Battista,
Cabrera, and Villanueva (2014), generation Z mainly
seeks a good working environment accompanied by
high remuneration with flexibility in their schedules,
additionally, they prefer face-to-face communication
and being supervised by a single boss regardless of the
supervisor's gender.
The objective of this research is to know the
new expectations and behaviors of Generation Z in
relation to the ideal company, ideal boss and ideal
environments or places of work for them. These three
constructs were analyzed because they are the most
aspects that Generation Z youth pay attention when
they are working and decide to stay in organizations for
a long time. To respond to this objective, the present
study will analyze different variables that Generation Z
considers to find the best place to work and the ideal
boss in order to understand the expectations and
preferences to enter the work environment applying
statistical methods of multidimensional scaling, the
groups of Generation Z and their characteristics will be
defined for each country with the aim of generating
knowledge so that companies objectively understand
what are the requirements of this Generation Z to select
the appropriate place of work and remain for a long time
within the organizations.
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
65
There are several reasons why this comparative study
between two Latin American countries is important.
Among many reasons, the following are some: a)
Understanding your job expectations in different
countries will allow you to identify generational trends
and how they evolve in different cultural, economic, and
social contexts. b) By comparing these differences,
insights can be gained on how to approach talent
management and employee retention in each location.
c) Generation Z represents the future of the labor
market, and understanding their expectations can help
you anticipate and proactively adapt to trends that will
influence the workforce. The present study will
answer the following research question: How do
the workplace preferences and expectations of
Generation Z differ between Colombia and Peru,
and what factors influence their decision-making
when choosing an employer?
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The emergence of Generation Z, often
referred to as Centennials, has significantly
transformed expectations within the workplace,
particularly in Latin America. This cohort, born
between the mid-1990s and early 2010s, is
characterized by a distinct set of values and
preferences that diverge from previous
generations. In Colombia and Peru, these
differences manifest in their demands for job
satisfaction, work-life balance, and organizational
alignment with personal values such as
sustainability and inclusivity.
Generation Z, also known as ‘post millennials’ or
‘centennials’, is the group of people born between
1995-2010 (Lanier, 2017; Chillakuri &
Mahanandia, 2018; Southgate, 2017; Bassiouni &
Hackley, 2014; Francis & Hoefel, 2018). According
to various scientific research, this cohort
represents 24% of the global population (Miller &
Lu, 2018; Mondres, 2019; Francis & Hoefel, 2018;
Spitznagel, 2020), and is the first generation born
into a context with access to the internet, digital
tools, and electronic devices, which makes
Generation Z part of the technological revolution
that took hold at the beginning of the 21
st
century
(Seemiller & Grace, 2017; Lenhart, Smith,
Anderson & Perrin, 2015).
A study carried out by the American
Psychological Association (APA), demonstrated
that at least 77% of this cohort are undergraduate
students who have a part-time job or an internship,
as well as professionals who are currently entering
the labor market (American Psychological
Association, 2017; Miller & Lu, 2018; Al-Asfour &
Lettau, 2014). This information is completely
necessary for employers to understand
Generation Z’s preferences when it comes to
applying for a job, so they can structure an efficient
hiring process and, of course, training and
qualification. Generation Z is a cohort different
from its predecessors because of the
circumstances that influenced their behavior and
perspectives toward life.
Ideal Company
An "ideal company" is often described as an
organization that embodies a set of desirable
characteristics and practices, leading to
exceptional performance and success. Precisely,
Thang et al ( 2022, p.6 ) have demonstrated in
their paper that “Generation Z believed that their
profiles would immediately improve and catch
more attention from other recruiters once they
leave said organizations”. The expectations of
Generation Z about an ideal company according to
Pataki-Bitto and Kapusy (2021) the corporation
must show employee-centered management to
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
66
improve the well-being of the employees by
creating a family-friendly, animal-friendly and
environment-friendly workplace, further, the ideal
company appreciates the effort employees make
and gives regular feedback on their performance
(Pataki-Bitto & Kapusy, 2021).
Generation Z is often described as
independent, eager to learn, and open-minded
when it comes to diversity, religion, social class, or
ethnicity (Kapil & Roy, 2014). They are also
described as forward-focused, energetic, creative,
rapid learners, multitaskers, individualistic, and
active workers, which are some valuable and
positive characteristics hiring processes require
(Half, 2015; Seemiller & Grace, 2017; Arar &
Öneren, 2018; Chillakuri & Mahanandia, 2018;
Sidorcuka & Chesnovicka, 2017). Researchers
affirm that Generation Z is the most achievement-
oriented generation since they want to be involved
in organizational processes because of their
structural behavior, innovative ideas, risk
propensity, and constant manipulation of
information (Barna Group 2018; Patel, 2017;
Kulcsár, 2020; Parija & Shanmuganathan, 2020;
Harris & Gibson, 2008; European Commission,
2012).
However, Generation Z is willing to
achieve professional goals in a short amount of
time without effort, and some employers consider
Generation Z members are impatient (Goh &
Okumus, 2020; Turner 2015). Researchers affirm
that this cohort is always hurried out and,
consequently, it is difficult for them to seek long-
term goals. Generation Z is constantly traveling,
moving from one city to another, and applying for
jobs all around the globe; they do not seek for
stability, instead, they try to avoid monotony
(Kulcsár, 2020; Steinerowska-Streb & Wziątek-
Staśko, 2016). For this reason, this cohort is
known for making the environment more
globalized, with more optimistic, diverse, and
dynamic perspectives that promote inclusion at the
workplace (Dill, 2017; Kirchmayer & Fratričová,
2018).
Generation Z is directly related to
technology since they were born into the digital
age, thus, they prefer working with modern
technologies instead of the conventional tangible
tools previous generations use (Elmore, 2014;
Oblinger & Oblinger, 2005; Prensky, 2001). They
require constant feedback for their work
improvement (Randstand, 2016; Dolot, 2018), and
digital resources for learning organizational
concepts and processes (Pearson Higher
Education Survey, 2018). This cohort has high
expectations for working. They want their ideas
implemented, be involved in the decision-making
process, have flexibility regarding their schedules,
and have good interpersonal relationships with
their coworkers (Schroth, 2019; Bresman & Rao,
2018).
However, at the same time, they feel
uncertain about their career, future professional
development, and their well-being (Bresman &
Rao, 2018; Daft, 2015). For the formulation of an
optimal hiring process aimed only at Generation Z,
employers should address career planning and
management, since this cohort has different
perspectives towards professional paths and
aspirations (Santos, 2016; Krishnan, Loon & Tan,
2018). Therefore, employers must be aware that
Generation Z value equal treatment, promotions,
opportunities for professional growth and balance
between work and family; they don’t like
hypercritical structures and repetitive routines, and
they are seeking for a better quality of life
compared to previous cohorts (Schwieger &
Ladwig, 2018; Arar & Öneren, 2018).
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
67
Job Characteristics
Rewards and recognition such as salary
increases, bonuses, among others, and
professional and job advancements immediately
and without little effort turn out to be widely
motivating factors for members of Generation Z
(Bari, Fanchen, & Baloch, 2016). Gen Z seeks to
have a flexible professional life where, due to their
entrepreneurial skills, they can not only create an
identity but, in turn, can be in various workplaces
that allow them to make significant contributions to
companies in response to the fact that Generation
Z is multicultural and global and has the ability to
transmit information clearly and be organized
(Tysiac, 2017; Santos, 2016).
It is important that companies consider the
preferences that attract members of Generation Z,
which are different from those of previous
generations (Ma, Hu & Gocłowska, 2016).
Generation Z seeks to work in companies with high
moral and ethical standards (Mintel, 2021; Singh &
Dangmei, 2016; Rothman, 2016). In addition,
technology, for its part, plays a strongly motivating
role for members of Generation Z since they want
to work with this modality to achieve their
objectives (Ozkan & Solmaz, 2015), in addition to
technology this generation got used to information
which allows a great variety of activities to be
carried out simultaneously and that the result is of
high quality (Cable & Parsons, 2001; Fernandes,
2018). Otherwise, Generation Z prefers to be part
of long-term projects where the contribution to the
environment, society, and global well-being can be
rewarding (Goh & Lee, 2017).
When applying the Theory of Planned
Behavior (TPB), researchers found out that
Generation Z members have great enthusiasm
when it comes to learning new skills because they
want to be prepared for a spectacular career
performance (Ajzen, 1991; Dill, 2017). Employer
Branding and Management Theory play a
significant role as well since Generation Z’s
performance is the product of their abilities
multiplied by their motivations (Silinevica &
Meirule, 2019). This cohort is motivated by finding
new growth opportunities, obtaining professional
benefits, recognition, money, meaningful work,
and even by a better self-esteem; hence, members
of the Generation Z end up volunteering until they
achieve these purposes (Wilson, 2000; Clary &
Snyder, 1999; Schwabel, 2014; Kubátová, 2016;
Voced, 2018). However, this cohort’s performance
depends not only on their motivations, but also on
their attitudes towards the activities they
volunteered for (Mischel, 1997; Katz, 1960).
Appropriate training programs would
encourage Generation Z to have a positive attitude
towards volunteering activities, misperceptions
regarding these training programs could
negatively affect Generation Z attitudes, leading
them to volunteer in other places where their
expectations are met (Armitage & Conner, 2001).
On the other hand, Generation Z prefers training
programs that include digital tools (Twenge, 2017;
Cartwright-Stroupe & Shinners, 2021), and goal
setting (Corn, Feldman & Wexler, 2020).
Researchers also agree that Human Resources
(HR), must be aware that members of the
Generation Z are also motivated by the tools they
are offered for completing their volunteering,
otherwise they wouldn’t feel comfortable working
with tools that are not enough for an optimum
performance (Ridderstrale, 2004).
In other words, Generation Z does not
agree with the traditional ‘office work culture’ since
they can easily adapt to technology and every
digital process business require, they prefer
working with new information technologies for
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
68
better performance (Ridderstrale, 2004; Brusch &
Kelly, 2014; Fernandes, 2018). They are tech-
savvy compared to every other cohort, and they
consider that working tasks can be automated
thanks to virtuality, reducing human efforts and
time (Barnes & Noble College, 2018). Members of
this generation prefer learning through videos,
interactive content, and collaborative virtual
groups (Pearson Higher Education Survey, 2018;
Seemiller & Grace 2017). Therefore, employers
should consider ways to integrate digital tools with
employee development and performance
management systems (Cilliers, 2017). In sum,
there is extensive literature that has studied the
relationship between job characteristics and
behavioral outcomes in general as intrinsic
motivation (Ravi, 2020). Gon and Lee (2017)
identified some practices very important to
Generation Z: Interesting work, cross-training
(different functions), working hours, anti-
discrimination policies, and workplace safety.
Ideal Boss
For members of Generation Z, social
relationships become an important need, however,
this socialization is carried out mainly through
social networks and text messaging (Pichler,
Kohli, & Granitz, 2021; Clark Kevin, 2017). What
makes them become virtual and superficial, the
latter being that Generation Z loses essential
communication rules such as: listening, asking,
knowing how to express themselves, having
coherence in a conversation, among others
(Bencsik & Machova, 2016; Tulgan, 2013; Pew
Research Center, 2012).
In addition, Generation Z wishes to
establish clear and open communications with
their superiors and co-workers, also that these
communications are interactive and with clear
responses (Kirchmayer & Fratričová, 2018;
Hershatter & Epstein, 2010). Likewise, members
of Generation Z consider it important not only to
have good relationships with their co-workers
(members of the same generation), but also that
with these relationships it is possible to create new
professional networks (Hampton & Welsh, 2019;
Fodor, Jäckel, & Pal Szilagyi, 2018; Kapil & Roy,
2014; Grow & Yang, 2018).
Otherwise, members of Generation Z do
not establish good working relationships with
members of previous generations, such as baby
boomers and Generation X, as this can lead to
misunderstandings in the workplace (Urick, et al,
2017; Safrankova & Sikyr, 2019). However, Gen Z
does find a relationship with Millennials, as they
identify with their leadership style and positive
attitude. (Al-Asfour & Lettau, 2014; Adecco, 2016).
Some leadership traits preferred by Gen Z are
assertive communications, positive and inclusive
culture, emotional intelligence, feedback,
commitment, equality, open-minded and
friendliness (Gabrielova & Buchko, 2021; Grow &
Yang, 2018). Otherwise, the members of
Generation Z demand constant guidance and
feedback on their activities from their bosses, this
in response to a reaction of having grown up in an
environment of likes or rewards of social networks
to which they are accustomed. If not, you think
they have done things wrong, or their work is not
significant in the company where they work
(Randstand, 2016; Sujansky & Ferri-Reed, 2009;
Center for Generational Kinetics, 2018).
One of the greatest generational changes
in companies that has been seen in recent times
is approaching, since now the first members of
Generation Z are entering the workplace (Al-
Asfour & Lettau, 2014; Tulgan, 2013). Therefore,
the role of the future employer is to attract this
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
69
generation by meeting their different professional
and work expectations that they have about the
place where they will work, which include
generous salaries, rapid professional growth,
health insurance, flexible hours, among others
(Sidorcuka and Chesnovicka, 2017; Half, 2015).
However, these expectations of the work
environment are often idealistic and unrealistic
(Bencsik, et al, 2016; Yu, 2019; Schroth, 2019).
Thus, the traditional workplaces where
there is overcrowding of employees and
accelerated standard of living do not convince
Generation Z; Generation Z prefers quiet spaces
where they can meet their peers occasionally
(Topuzovska Latkovikja & Borota Popovskab,
2020). In addition, to look for workplaces adapted
to their tastes, where there are no geographical
limits and schedules to be able to carry out their
different activities which must be innovative and
creative, likewise, be able to make significant
contributions to the companies where they are
working (Seemiller & Grace, 2017; Ozkan &
Solmaz, 2015).
On the other hand, the desire to have
autonomy when developing the different tasks is a
characteristic highly valued by Generation Z, even
more than previous generations (Mintel, 2021)
Since being autonomous they could develop their
activities in a better way and at their own expense.
Instead, reduce costs to companies, in addition to
reducing job desertion by this generation (Deci &
Ryan, 1985). It should be clarified that this
generation is less involved in the workplace than
past generations (Statnickė, Savanevičienė, &
Šakys, 2019).
Otherwise, due to the internet and social
networks, the existing cultural diversity in
companies is not a limitation to be accepted by
Generation Z, since this allows interaction with
people from all over the world to be easy for them.
allows one to be well-prepared for a work
environment (Apuzzo, 2015). As was mentioned
by Jiri (2016) ideal boss is a coach/mentor (51 %),
a leader (40 %), an advisor (34 %), a
confidant/discuss private and work matters (30 %),
a friend (16 %), and a director/allocator of work (10
%).
3. METODOLOGY
The study was quantitative with a descriptive
observational scope based on a non-probabilistic
sample of Centennial students from 13 Higher
Education Institutions (IES) between Colombia
and Peru. In terms of statistical analysis, the
following techniques were used sequentially: a)
Hierarchical Cluster b) Non-Metric
Multidimensional Scaling and c) Cluster k-means,
to obtain a profile of the job expectations of
Centennials. An online survey was applied
between June and July 2020, in which a total of
2754 individuals participated in order to make a
contrast between the two countries, 1004 surveys
were applied in Colombia (37%) and 1750 surveys
were in Peru (63%). The respondents were
students from 18 to 23 years old from 22 higher
education institutions located in Colombia and
Peru. All the participants are centennial students
from business schools, of the professional careers
of Administration, Marketing, Business
International, Accounting, Economics, and Human
Resources. The 22 reagents used in the
investigation have been shown to have high values
of reliability and validity. However, it should be
noted that these results are based on the use of
Schwartz's (1992) universal value theories, which
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
70
states that values can be organized in quadrants
of opposite poles, distinguishing between self-
transcendence values and self-preservation on the
one hand (people who value justice, equity,
collective well-being, and personal stability), and
the values of self-promotion and openness to
change and McClelland's human needs (1985)
also maintains that people can be motivated,
among others, by achievement (focused on goals,
tasks, and success) or by affiliation (focused on
people, collaboration, and common welfare).
The group of questions investigates job
expectations in three different dimensions: a) ideal
company to work for, b) ideal boss to work with,
and c) characteristics that a job should have. a) In
the ideal company dimension: from a list of 9
items, students are asked to choose only three, the
most important for them. The question is, what
characteristics should an ideal company to work
for have? The items are 1. High invoicing, 2.
Company with values similar to mine, 3. That is
multinational/international, 4. Innovative, 5. With
prestige/great reputation, 6. With salaries and
benefits above the average, 7. Socially
responsible or with good purpose, 8. That provides
a career line or professional development, 9. That
values the well-being (quality of life) of its
employees. b) Assessment of the qualities of the
ideal boss. From a list of 7 items, students are
asked to choose only three, the most important for
him/her. The question is what attributes do you
value most in a boss? The items are: 1. Sense of
humor, 2. Flexibility, 3. Intelligence, 4. Long-term
vision, 5. Technical knowledge, 6. Good values, 7.
Good communication. and c) Evaluation of the
characteristics that a job should have. From a list
of 7 items, Centennials are asked to rate each
characteristic on a Likert scale, where 1 is not
important at all and 5 is very important. The
question is what characteristics are the most
important that a job should have? The items are:
1. Good relationships with
bosses/clients/coworkers, 2. Good training
opportunities/learn new skills, 3. Work-life
balance, 4. Good compensation plan (bonuses,
incentives, health benefits, etc..), 5. Job stability /
Business sustainability, 6. Challenging job, 7.
Opportunity to travel. The software used for data
analysis was SPSS V.24.
4. RESULTS
According to Table 1, in the case of Colombia, the
sample is equally distributed between men (45%) and
women (55%), however, in Peru there is a higher
proportion of women (72%) compared to men (28%).
Likewise, the age in both groups is similar with a mean
of 23 years and a standard deviation of approximately
1.7 years. On the other hand, in Business
Administration the 4th and 2nd semesters turned out to
be the most representative, indicated by the value of
fashion, while for Marketing/Business Management,
International Business (international trade) and HR, in
the Colombian case the majority of the students are in
the 2nd and 3rd semesters, which indicates that job
expectations are still in formation.
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
71
Colombia Country Results
Table 2 shows which items were most valued and least
valued by the respondents. Here it can be understood
that in the Ideal Company dimension, the items that
matter most to Generation Z are an innovative
company and a socially responsible company with
similar securities. In addition, the most valued attributes
for the Ideal Boss dimension are good communication,
good values, and that leaders have a long-term vision.
Table 1. Descriptives
Country
Colombia
Peru
n=1004
n=1750
Male
45%
28%
Female
55%
72%
Mean
23
23
SD
±1,61
±1,70
Semester
Mean
5
5
Median
5
4
Mode
4
2
Semester
Mean
5
6
Median
5
5
Mode
2
a
5
Semester
Mean
4
5
Median
3
5
Mode
3
6
Semester
Mean
5
5
Median
5
5
Mode
2
5
Semester
Mean
.
6
Median
.
6
Mode
.
10
Source: own elaboration, 2022
Table 2. Company attributes and the Ideal Boss
Dimension
Value
%
Ideal Company
Innovative
57%
Socially responsible
56%
Similar Securities
49%
Multinational international
37%
Superior promise wages
34%
Welfare quality of life
21%
Professional development
20%
Prestige reputation
16%
High Invoicing
9%
Most valued attributes of a Ideal Boss
Good Communication
63%
Good values
41%
Long term vision
34%
Intelligence
29%
Flexibility
14%
Technical knowledge
13%
Sense of humor
6%
Note: multiple choices
Source: own elaboration, 2022
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
72
Affording to Table 3, the data indicate that training opportunities (74%), work-life balance (73%), and a good relationship with
the boss are the most important elements for centennials, in counterpart, challenging work (44%) and travel opportunities
(50%) have a lower degree of relevance.
Table 3. Job Characteristics
Variable
Less
important
Most important
Training opportunities
0%
0%
4%
22%
74%
Work life balance
0%
1%
4%
22%
73%
Good relationship boss
0%
0%
4%
24%
71%
Job stability
0%
0%
3%
27%
69%
Compensation plan
0%
1%
7%
34%
58%
Travel opportunity
0%
3%
13%
33%
50%
Challenging work
0%
2%
12%
42%
44%
Source: own elaboration, 2022
In comparison, it was evaluated if there were significant differences between both genders, obtaining the following results. The
analysis of Table 4 indicates that, in the case of the ideal Company, there are statistically significant differences between men
and women in the variables high invoicing, prestige reputation, and socially responsible, identifying that it is the male gender
that values the billing of the company more. company (2: 9,796; p=0.002) and reputation (2: 22,237; p=0.00), while women
are in search of socially responsible organizations (2: 17,331; p=0.00). Likewise, in the most valued attributes of the Ideal
Boss, there are significant differences, men appreciate a sense of humor more (2: 11,550; p=0.001) while women prefer
good communication (2: 15,287; p=0.00). and good values (2: 7.934; p=0.005).
Table 4. Differences between gender Colombia
Ideal Company
Male
Female
X2
p-value
High Invoicing
61%
39%
9,796
0,002*
Similar Securities
50%
50%
3,12
0,77
Multinational international
45%
55%
0,014
0,907
Innovative
45%
55%
0,44
0,833
Prestige reputation
62%
38%
22,237
0,00*
Superior promise wages
46%
54%
0,343
0,558
Socially responsible
38%
62%
17,331
0,00*
Professional development
41%
59%
3,331
0,068
Welfare quality of life
43%
57%
1,967
0,161
Most valued attributes of an Ideal Boss
Sense of humor
67%
33%
11,55
0,001*
Flexibility
52%
48%
3,819
0,051
Intelligence
49%
51%
3,214
0,073
Long term vision
47%
53%
1,048
0,306
Technical knowledge
51%
49%
2,303
0,129
Good values
40%
60%
7,934
0,005
Good Communication
40%
60%
15,287
0,00*
*The Chi-square statistic is significant at the 0,05 level.
*The Chi-square statistic is significant at the 0,05 level.
Source: own elaboration, 2022
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
73
Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA)
An HCA was carried out in order to understand the
way in which the variables associated with the
ideal company, ideal boss, and characteristics that
the ideal workplace should have been
agglomerating, given that this type of technique
allows segmenting and identifying homogeneous
groups that they can be classified by cases
(observations) or variables (Ghosal,
Bhattacharyya & Majumder, 2020). For this, the
Ward method was used, which measures the total
sum of the squares of the deviations between each
observation and the mean of the cluster where it is
located based on the squared Euclidean
distances, as a result, this technique is one of the
most used in practice due to their high
discriminative level (Sharma & Batra, 2019).
On the other hand, it was necessary to perform a
transformation to Z scores of the values for each
question, since they were measured on different
scales, binary in the case of multiple answers for
company and ideal boss, Likert for the attributes of
an ideal job. Once these parameters were
established, the initial agglomeration was
observed, determining the existence of three
clusters, and taking them as a reference to
continue with the analysis. Finally, it was decided
to generate the proximity matrix that explains the
similarity between each of the analyzed variables,
this as input for the following statistical process,
Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS).
Next, the result of the HCA is shown in the
dendrogram with the selected clusters.
Figure 1.
Colombia - Dendrogram using Ward Linkage
Source: own elaboration, 2022
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
74
The dendrogram shows (See Figure 1) a
grouping in three clusters that could be named: 1)
awareness company (blue); 2) kaizen company
(red) and 3) committed company (gray), each one
made up of a combination of variables associated
with the ideal company, characteristics of a good
job and ideal boss. Regarding cluster 1
awareness company, it is important to point out
that it is characterized by having elements related
to a good job, which is perceived as one that
generates professional opportunities, balance
between personal and work life, stability, adequate
compensation plans and positive relationships
with the bosses. This group would be aligned or
would be in accordance with an ideal company and
ideal boss as was explained in the theoretical
framework, in fact, Generation Z is willing to
achieve professional goals in a short amount of
time without effort, and some employers consider
Generation Z members are impatient (Goh &
Okumus, 2020; Turner 2015).
The second cluster named the kaizen
company cluster is associated with continuous
improvement, characterized by professional
development, reputation as a company in the
international arena, technical knowledge, billing
and flexibility in line with job characteristics
explained in the theoretical framework where
Generation Z seeks to work in companies with high
moral and ethical standards (Mintel, 2021; Singh &
Dangmei, 2016; Rothman, 2016). While cluster 3
called committed company is related to aspects
such as innovation, long-term vision, values,
assertive communication, social responsibility and
well-being, that is slightly more intangible
elements that were observed in job characteristics
variable because they prefer working with new
information technologies for better performance
(Ridderstrale, 2004; Brusch & Kelly, 2014;
Fernandes, 2018). Next, a projection of these
categories was obtained on a two-dimensional
plane (common space) through the non-metric
multidimensional scaling technique, in order to
observe the similarities and differences between
all the categories analyzed, as shown in figure 2.
As you can see in Figure 2, in the three circles it is
possible to identify the three groups in the blue
color awareness company, in the yellow circle
Kaizen company and in the red circle committed
company. Companies can learn about the
characteristics of each group of Generation Z and
their expectations and desires to make the hiring
process more efficient and long-term for the
benefit of Generation Z and companies. In
addition, Figure 2 shows also that a company
called an awareness company should be empathic
from Generation Z point of view being an
organization very human, also, a Kaizen company
must be sensitive and competitive when
Generation Z analyses the workplace ideal.
Finally, a committed company must be
characterized as very responsible with its
decisions.
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
75
Proximities calculated with squared
Euclidean distance applying Torgerson algorithm.
Normalized Raw Stress = 0.08156; S-
Stress=0.23397; Dispersion Accounted For
(D.A.F.) = 0.9084; Tucker's Coefficient of
Congruence = 0.9531.
Source: own elaboration, 2022
Figure 2.
Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling Colombia
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
76
The NMDS (Proxscal) was performed
using the proximity matrix obtained in the previous
step (hierarchical cluster) in order to generate
results consistent with the clusters obtained. It is
important to note that this matrix contains values
(proximities) between each of the variables,
allowing them to be projected on a two-
dimensional plane (Mulca & Dhame, 2019). On the
other hand, the input variables were specified as
intervals, that is, continuous, subsequently
applying Torgerson’s algorithm (1952) for the
initial configuration, which allows for optimizing the
stress obtained from the procedure.
According to Mukherjee, Sinha &
Chattopadhyay (2018), Stress is not in itself a
measure of the goodness of fit of the model, but
the opposite, that is, the non-goodness of fit, so it
is assumed that the lower its better value the
model. This is how Kruskal (1964) reviewed it and
developed the interpretation for the Normalized
Raw Stress (NRS).
Table 5
Normalized Raw Stress
Poor
0.2
Acceptable
0.1
Well
0.05
Very good
0.025
Great
0.0
Source: Kruskal (1964)
Based on the NRS obtained (0.08156), it
is considered that the model is in the good
category as indicated in the previous Table 5, in
addition, the DAF and Tucker's Coefficient of
Congruence close to 1 confirm it. In this sense, it
is observed in Figure 3 that the response options
are distributed among four quadrants along both
dimensions, considering the left loop as the
Human Company dimension, while the lower one
is more associated with Attractive Company.
Subsequently, a K-Means cluster analysis was
performed in order to form conglomerates and
identify their projection on the two-dimensional
plane proposed by the NMDS.
Figure 1.
Cluster Analysis - Colombia
K-means algorithm
Source: own elaboration, 2022
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
77
Using the final coordinates of the NMDS, clusters 1 and 2 are projected on the plane as a product of k-means,
observing that 75% of the cases belonging to cluster 1 are clustered in the area associated with Empathic and
Responsible Company, while cluster 2 with a size of 25% is located towards the Sensitive and Competitive Company
dimension. On the other hand, it is important to point out that approximately 57% of the cases belonging to cluster 1 are
clustered in quadrant I associated with the Empathic Company, that is, they value aspects such as good relations with
superiors, training opportunities, quality of life, good values, balance between work and personal life. Likewise, the
variables located in quadrant I belong to the awareness company cluster identified in the dendrogram. Finally, the k-
means clusters are validated using a random sample of 50% of the data, as follows in Table 6.
Table 6
Cross Validation clustering - Colombia
Original data
1
2
Total
N
%
N
%
N
%
Random
sampling
1
380
97,4%
4
3,3%
384
75,1%
2
10
2,6%
117
96,7%
127
24,9%
Total
390
100,0%
121
100,0%
511
100,0%
Rand Index (RI): 0,9086
Sample 50% of the original data
Source: Own Elaboration, 2022
The validation indicates that the clusters obtained in the sample agree 90.86% of the time, demonstrated by the
RI, that is, that most of the cases maintained their final cluster when applying the algorithm to a subsample of the data.
Peru Country Results
For Generation Z in Peru, the three main characteristics (see Table 7) of the ideal company are related to Professional
Development, Welfare quality of life, and Innovative, with high invoicing being one of the least valued aspects with 5% of
the total responses. In the same way, Good Communication, Good values, and long-term vision are the most demanded
attributes in a leader, while a sense of humor would not be the most striking trait compared to the rest.
Table 7. Company attributes and the ideal boss
Dimension
Value
%
Ideal Company
Professional development
60,1%
Welfare quality of life
59,6%
Innovative
42,9%
Socially responsible
42,4%
Superior promise wages
31,8%
Prestige reputation
21,6%
Multinational international
19,1%
Similar Securities
17,4%
High Invoicing
5,1%
Most valued attributes of a Ideal Boss
Good Communication
62,9%
Good values
50,3%
Long term vision
28,5%
Intelligence
21,0%
Flexibility
19,8%
Technical knowledge
11,0%
Sense of humor
6,5%
Note: multiple choices
Source: Own Elaboration, 2022
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
78
Using the final coordinates of the NMDS, clusters 1 and 2 are projected on the plane as a product of k-means,
observing that 75% of the cases belonging to cluster 1 are clustered in the area associated with Empathic and
Responsible Company, while cluster 2 with a size of 25% is located towards the Sensitive and Competitive Company
dimension. On the other hand, it is important to point out that approximately 57% of the cases belonging to cluster 1 are
clustered in quadrant I associated with the Empathic Company, that is, they value aspects such as good relations with
superiors, training opportunities, quality of life, good values, balance between work and personal life. Likewise, the
variables located in quadrant I belong to the awareness company cluster identified in the dendrogram. Finally, the k-
means clusters are validated using a random sample of 50% of the data, as follows in Table 6.
Table 6
Cross Validation clustering - Colombia
Original data
1
2
Total
N
%
N
%
N
%
Random
sampling
1
380
97,4%
4
3,3%
384
75,1%
2
10
2,6%
117
96,7%
127
24,9%
Total
390
100,0%
121
100,0%
511
100,0%
Rand Index (RI): 0,9086
Sample 50% of the original data
Source: Own Elaboration, 2022
The validation indicates that the clusters obtained in the sample agree 90.86% of the time, demonstrated by the RI,
that is, that most of the cases maintained their final cluster when applying the algorithm to a subsample of the data.
Peru Country Results
For Generation Z in Peru, the three main characteristics (see Table 7) of the ideal company are related to Professional
Development, Welfare quality of life, and Innovative, with high invoicing being one of the least valued aspects with 5%
of the total responses. In the same way, Good Communication, Good values, and long-term vision are the most
demanded attributes in a leader, while a sense of humor would not be the most striking trait compared to the rest.
Table 7. Company attributes and the ideal boss
Dimension
Value
%
Ideal Company
Professional development
60,1%
Welfare quality of life
59,6%
Innovative
42,9%
Socially responsible
42,4%
Superior promise wages
31,8%
Prestige reputation
21,6%
Multinational international
19,1%
Similar Securities
17,4%
High Invoicing
5,1%
Most valued attributes of a Ideal Boss
Good Communication
62,9%
Good values
50,3%
Long term vision
28,5%
Intelligence
21,0%
Flexibility
19,8%
Technical knowledge
11,0%
Sense of humor
6,5%
Note: multiple choices
Source: Own Elaboration, 2022
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
79
Hierarchical Cluster Analysis
In the case of Peru, there was a sample of
1750 cases, applying the same analytical techniques
for Colombia. In this sense, the result of the
hierarchical cluster exposed in Figure 4 is detailed.
Figure 4.
It is observed that the agglomeration of variables
in the context of Peru is similar to that obtained in
Colombia (See Figure 4). Specifically, cluster 1
(blue) brings together elements that identify as an
awareness company, while cluster 2 kaizen
Company (orange) is more associated with
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
80
elements of reputation/success where salary,
billing and innovation are valued as key factors. On
the contrary, cluster 3 committed company is
related to intangible values such as social
responsibility, good communication, well-being
and quality of life. Likewise, the projection of these
variables in the two-dimensional plane is analyzed
by means of NMDS. As you can see in Figure 5, in
the three circles it is possible to identify the three
groups in the blue color awareness company, in
the yellow circle Kaizen company and in the red
circle committed company. Companies can learn
about the characteristics of each group of
Generation Z and their expectations and desires to
make the hiring process more efficient and long-
term for the benefit of Generation Z and
companies.
Figure 5.
NMDS Peru
Source: own elaboration, 2022
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
81
In the quadrant I (See Figure 5) Competitive Company
are elements of the company such as reputation,
multinational and high turnover, while the
characteristics of the leader are technical knowledge,
flexibility, sense of humor. Based on the above, this
area of the graph can be associated with a combination
of a successful company in terms of international
projection and flexible and intelligent leadership. For its
part, quadrant II Responsible Company is identified by
innovation, social responsibility, similar values, with a
leader who has a long-term vision.
Meanwhile, Quadrant III Emphatic Company leans
towards well-being, quality of life, good relations with
the boss, job stability, compensation plans, training
opportunities and a challenging job. Finally, quadrant
IV Sensitive Company is characterized by good
communication, professional development and
superior salaries. In general, based on the results, it
can be assumed that dimension 1 is related to the
vision of a Human Company, while dimension 2
Attractive Company is oriented towards success,
reputation and professional development. Next, the
cluster analysis (figure 6) shows the projection in this
two-dimensional space.
Figure 6.
Cluster Analysis Peru
Source: own elaboration, 2022
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
82
In Figure 6, there is an agglomeration of
cluster 1 towards dimension 2 (Attractive company),
distributed between quadrants I and IV, on the other
hand, cluster 2 is concentrated in dimension 1 (Human
company) between quadrants II and III. In this sense, it
is observed that approximately 75% of cluster 1 is
inclined towards aspects related to the successful
company, valuing its reputation, prestige, international
projection, high salaries, professional development
opportunities with leadership that has flexibility, sense
of humor, technical knowledge and good
communication. Specifically, cluster 1 is evenly divided
with approximately 50% of the cases between
competitiveness (I) and sensitivity (IV), even taking
traits of the human company when placed in quadrants
associated with responsibility (II) and empathic (III).
In contrast, cluster 2 focuses on elements
such as values, social responsibility, well-being and
quality of life, the balance between work and personal
life, training opportunities and a challenging job.
Specifically, quadrant II (responsibility) accounts for
55% of the cases, while the rest is distributed towards
empathy. Finally, it is important to mention that the
cases that are located in the center of the dimensions,
that is, where the axes of the graph intersect, are cases
that do not show a clear tendency to their ideal job,
since they have scores close to zero. in both
dimensions and are not inclined towards either the
human company or the attractive company (see red
circle for example). In order to validate these findings,
the cross-validation table with a 50% sample is shown
below (See Table 10). With a random sample of 50%,
an RI = 0.997 was obtained, that is, the k-means
algorithm was able to correctly classify the original
cases and those taken in the sample.
In conclusion, observing the results of the NMDS for
Colombia and Peru, some important elements stand
out. In the first place, Colombia, quadrant I of the
NDMS graph indicates that the variables that
characterize it are related to orientation towards work
in a more humane environment, for example, well-
being and quality of life, positive relationship with the
boss, good values, communication and training
opportunities.
While for Peru this same quadrant is associated with
prestige and reputation, a company with an
international background, high turnover, technical
knowledge of the boss, flexibility and sense of humor
of the leader, being described as a profile oriented to
business success.
Second, quadrant II for Colombia is oriented
towards professional development in a competitive
context, while Peru is inclined towards topics such as
innovation, social responsibility, values, long-term
Table 10.
Cross Validation clustering - Peru
Original data
1
2
Total
N
%
N
%
N
%
Random
sampling
1
660
99,7%
0
0%
660
73%
2
2
0,3%
242
100%
244
27%
Total
662
100%
242
26,8%
904
100,0%
Rand Index (RI): 0,997
Sample 50% of the original data
Source: own elaboration, 2022
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
83
vision of the leader and intelligence, considering a
more humane perception of the world of work. Thirdly,
quadrant III agglomerates variables associated with the
knowledge, reputation and turnover of the company,
contrary to Peru where it is observed that this segment
is more related to good relations with the boss, well-
being, quality of life and job opportunities. training.
Lastly, quadrant IV for Colombia is described as
innovative, socially responsible and innovative, while
for Peru it is characterized more as professional
development, high salaries and good communication
with the boss. In addition, with Battista, Cabrera, and
Villanueva (2014), generation Z mainly seeks a good
working environment accompanied by high
remuneration with flexibility in their schedules. This
research has showed also that centennials in Colombia
and Peru have compensation plans and work-life
balance are characteristics that they are looking for
when they are selecting a workplace. According to
Randstad (2016) and Dolot (2018) centennial
generation require constant feedback for their work
improvement, in study findings good relationships boss
and professional development are features analyzed
for centennials in both countries.
Generation Z seeks to work in companies with
high moral and ethical standards (Mintel, 2021 et al;
2016; Rothman, 2016). This affirmation is also seen
because of the investigation where the centennials
evaluate their ideal company one that is socially
responsible with a high prestige in reputation. Flexibility
and superior promise wages are variables that are
seeking Generation Z in Colombia and Peru to work as
well as Sidorcuka and Chesnovicka (2017) mentioned:
they look for a place where they will work, which include
generous salaries, rapid professional growth, health
insurance, flexible hours, among others. Also, in this
comparative study, a good relationship with the boss is
very important for both group but centennials from
Colombia is more relevant than centennials in Peru as
was demonstrated by Randstad (2016); Sujansky &
Ferri-Reed (2009) and Center for Generational Kinetics
(2018) where they point out the members of Generation
Z demand constant guidance and feedback on their
activities from their bosses.
Comparativo Colombia - Peru
Table 11. Differences between gender Colombia and Peru
Ideal Company
Colombia
Perú
X2
p-value
High Invoicing
63,5%
36,5%
15,069
,000*
Innovative
56,7%
43,3%
45,359
,000*
Similar Securities
55,2%
44,8%
6,818
,009*
Socially responsible
53,8%
46,2%
12,642
,000*
Superior promise wages
51,7%
48,3%
1,450
0,229
Multinational international
51,2%
48,8%
0,388
0,534
Welfare quality of life
48,9%
51,1%
1,817
0,178
Prestige reputation
41,8%
58,2%
15,000
,000*
Professional development
38,4%
61,6%
131,262
,000*
Most valued attributes of a ideal Boss
Intelligence
58,0%
42,0%
22,717
,000*
Long term vision
54,1%
45,9%
7,881
,005*
Technical knowledge
53,6%
46,4%
1,754
0,185
Good Communication
50,2%
49,8%
0,051
0,821
Sense of humor
46,6%
53,4%
0,767
0,381
Good values
45,2%
54,8%
20,063
,000*
Flexibility
41,8%
58,2%
13,608
,000*
*The Chi-square statistic is significant at the 0,05 level
Source: own elaboration, 2022
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
84
There are significant differences between Colombia
and Peru in terms of High Invoicing, Innovative, Similar
Securities, and Socially responsible, which means that
young Colombians direct their job preferences towards
these attributes in companies. In contrast, Peruvian
Generation Z are more inclined towards prestige and
reputation, as well as professional development.
Regarding Superior promise wages, Multinational
international, and Welfare quality of life, no statistically
significant differences were observed between the two
countries.
Regarding the attributes of the boss, the data
indicates that Colombians value intelligence and long-
term vision more, while Peruvians indicated good
values and flexibility as the most valuable traits of a
boss. On the other hand, a T Student test was applied
for the characteristics of a good job dimension to
determine if the average score of the associated Likert
scale was statistically significant between each
country. The results of this process are shown in Figure
7.
Figure 2. Average scores are Job characteristics.
Source: own elaboration, 2022
Training
opportuniti
es
Work life
balance
Good
relationshi
p boss
Job
stability
Compensa
tion plan
Travel
opportunity
Challengin
g work
Colombia
3,69 3,68 3,67 3,65 3,50 3,32 3,29
Peru
3,64 3,53 3,60 3,53 3,50 3,28 3,23
3,00
3,10
3,20
3,30
3,40
3,50
3,60
3,70
3,80
Average scores
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
85
Table 12 presents for Colombia case, Generation Z
considers the work-life balance more relevant than their
Peruvian peers (t:1,940; p=0.000), they also value a
good relationship boss (t:2,878; p=0.004) and job
stability as more important aspects (t: 4,805; p=0.000).
In addition, it is worth noting that in noin case did the
average score for Peru obtained for this dimension
exceed the assessment made by Colombians, so it can
be assumed that for Peruvians these characteristics
have less relevance in comparative terms.
Additionally, when looking at the results of the
NMDS for Colombia and Peru, some important
elements stand out. Firstly, in Colombia, quadrant I of
the NDMS graph indicates that the variables that
characterize it are related to orientation towards work
in a more humane environment, for example, well-
being and quality of life, positive relationship with the
boss, good values, communication and training
opportunities, while for Peru this same quadrant is
associated with prestige and reputation, a company
with international experience, high invoice, technical
knowledge of the boss, flexibility and sense of humor
of the leader, being described as a profile business
success oriented.
Secondly, Quadrant II for Colombia is oriented towards
professional development in a competitive context,
while Peru leans towards issues such as innovation,
social responsibility, values, long-term vision of the
leader and intelligence, considering a more humane
perception of working world. Third, quadrant III brings
together variables associated with the company's
knowledge, reputation, and billing, contrary to Peru,
where it is observed that this segment is more related
to good relations with the boss, well-being, quality of
life, and job opportunities. training. Finally, quadrant IV
for Colombia is described as innovative, socially
responsible and innovative, while for Peru it is
characterized more as professional development, high
salaries and good communication with the boss.
5. CONCLUSIONS
For the two groups of centennials in Peru and
Colombia, there is a similar grouping in the three
segments called awareness, kaizen and committed
company, changing some variables between clusters
such as long-term vision, innovation and travel
opportunity, the other variables present the same
behavior in each cluster. This means that companies in
Table 2. Differences entre Average scores Job characteristics Colombia y Perú
Colombia
Peru
t
p value
Training opportunities
3,69
3,64
1,940
0,052
Work life balance
3,68
3,53
5,752
0,000*
Good relationship boss
3,67
3,60
2,878
0,004*
Job stability
3,65
3,53
4,805
0,000*
Compensation plan
3,50
3,50
0,032
0,974
Travel opportunity
3,32
3,28
1,104
0,270
Challenging work
3,29
3,23
1,806
0,071
*Estadísticamente significativo con p < 0.05
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
86
both Colombia and Peru must strive to demonstrate
these variables with great transparency and honesty to
attract and keep centennials in their workforce.
In both groups, a change is understood
according to the Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling
analysis where the four quadrants were named
between empathic, responsible, committed, and
sensitive company. The alignment with the name of the
groups analyzed in the dendrogram for Colombia, the
empathic company of being awareness, the sensitive
company must be kaizen and responsible must be
committed for the centennials in Colombia instead for
the group of generation Z in Peru, the sensitive
company must be aware, responsible must be kaizen,
and committed must be competitive and responsible. In
other words, a company empathic for centennials is
one in which the boss has good interpersonal
relationships, there is a quality of life, the company has
good values and has excellent communication
channels. The responsible company for centennials
must have a long-term vision, a positive reputation and
is socially responsible. A sensitive company is where
there is very precise professional development,
delivers higher wages, and very flexible for place and
work hours. Finally, the competitive company is the one
that has a high invoicing, a lot of technical knowledge
and is very intelligent in making decisions.
Another important conclusion comparing the
cluster analysis of Colombia and Peru is how
Centennials evaluate the companies where they want
to work. For Centennials in Colombia, 57% prefer
companies that are understood as human and
especially empathic in the quality of life of workers,
good relations with the boss, training opportunities and
good values. On the other hand, the Centennials in
Peru, prefer 50% more attractive and competitive
companies where high invoicing, multinational
companies, and prestige reputations. In other words, in
Colombia, centennials would like to work in companies
that are more human than attractive, and in Peru,
centennials prefer companies that are more attractive
than humans. These findings are very important for
companies that want to generate strategies to capture
the attention of Generation Z and captivate them to
work in their companies and develop all their
capabilities offered by this generation that has a focus
on technology and precise demands on the part of
employers to develop their professional lives inside
companies.
Managerial Implications and future research
Understanding the expectations and job
preferences of this Generation Z will allow companies
to adapt to the needs of this new generation because
they are a significant part of the workforce. In addition,
creating programs and initiatives to retain and attract
talent, is important because the expectations of
Generation Z about work and the work environment
can change from previous generations such as
Millennials or Generation X. Also, companies are
thinking always about productivity and engagement,
when companies understand the expectations of
Generation Z, they can implement workplace policies
and practices that encourage the productivity and
engagement of these employees. Likewise, change in
organizational culture: The employment expectations
of Generation Z may require changes in organizational
culture, management structures, and leadership
practices. In summary, understanding the work
expectations of Generation Z is crucial for companies
to adapt to generational change, attract and retain
talent, foster innovation, and create a more productive
and satisfying work environment for all their
employees. Future research would focus on observing
the behavior of Generation Z in the work environment
and confirming the results with these findings using
multivariate models with structural equations to
statistically understand the behavior of the constructs
and accurately observable variables.
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
87
6. REFERENCES
Adecco. (2016). Generation Z vs. Millennials.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.
Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process, Vol.
50, p. 179 - 211.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-
5978(91)90020-T
Al-Asfour, A., Lettau, L. (2014). Strategies for
leadership styles for multi-generational
workforce. Journal of Leadership,
Accountability, and Ethics, Vol. 11, Issue 2,
p.58 - 69.
American Psychological Association APA. (2017).
Stress in America Copying with Change
Part 2, APA.
Apuzzo, R. (2015). Always Connected: Generation Z,
the “Digitarians”.
Arar, T., Öneren, M. (2018). Role of Talent
Management in Career Development of
Generation Z: A Case Study of a
Telecommunication Firm. Int. Acad. Journal
Soc. Sci., Vol. 5, p. 28 44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.9756/IAJSS/V5I1/181000
4
Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the
theory of planned behaviour: A meta-
analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol,
Vol. 40, p. 471 - 499.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466601
164939
Bari, M. W., Fanchen, M., & Baloch, M. A. (2016).
"TQM soft practices and job satisfaction;
mediating role of relational
psychological contract". Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, v. 235, pp.453
462.
Barna Group. (2018). Is Gen Z the most success-
oriented generation? Retrieved from:
https://www.barna.com/research/is-
gen-z-the-most-success-oriented-generation/
Barnes & Noble College (2018). Getting to Know Gen
Z: exploring middle and high
schoolers’ expectations for higher
education.
Bassiouni, D.H., Hackley, C. (2014). Generation Z’
children’s adaptation to digital consumer
culture: a critical literature review.
Journal of Customer
Behaviour, Vol. 13, Issue 2, p. 113 - 133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1362/147539214X140247
79483591
Battista, A., Cabrera, L., & Villanueva F. (2014).
Demandas laborales de la Generación Z.
Universidad Argentina de la
Empresa.
Bencsik, A., et al, (2016). Y and Z Generations at
workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, Vol.
8, Issue 3, p. 90 106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
Bencsik, A., & Machova, R. (2016). Knowledge Sharing
Problems from the Viewpoint of
Intergeneration Management. ICMLG2016-
4th International Conference on Management,
Leadership and Governance: ICMLG2016.
Published by Academic Conferences and
publishing international limited. Pp. 42-50
Bresman H., & Rao, V. (2018). Building Leaders for the
Next Decade: How to Support the
Workplace Goals of Generation X, Y
and Z. Universum eBook, joint collaboration
between Universum, INSEAD
Emerging Markets Institute, MIT Leadership
Center, and The HEAD Foundation.
Brusch, D., & Kelly, K. (2014). Managing
Multigenerational Workplace, UNC Executive
Development. UNC Kenan Flagler
Business School.
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
88
Cartwright-Stroupe, L., Shinners, J. (2021). Moving
forward together: What hope, efficacy,
optimism, and resilience tell us about
generation z. Journal of Continuing Education
in Nursing, Vol. 52, Issue 4, p. 160
162. DOI: 10.3928/00220124-20210315-02
Center for Generational Kinetics. (2018). State of Gen
Z 2018: Surprising new research on Gen Z as
employees and consumers. Retrieved from
https://genhq.com/generation-z-research-
2018/
Chillakuri, B., Mahanandia, R. (2018). Generation Z
entering the workforce: the need for
sustainable strategies in maximizing
their talent. Human Resource Management
International Digest, Vol. 26, Issue 4,
p. 34 - 38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-01-
2018-0006
Cilliers, E.J. (2017). The challenge of teaching
Generation Z. International Journal of Social
Sciences, Vol. 3, Issue 1, p. 188 19
http://dx.doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017
.31.188198
Cable, D. M., & Parsons, C. K. (2001). Socialization
tactics and person organization fit.
Personnel Psychology, Vol. 54, Issue
1, p. 1 - 23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-
6570.2001.tb00083.x
Clark Kevin, R. (2017). Managing Multiple Generations
in the Workplace. Radiol Technol. Vol. 88. p.
379396.
Clary, E.G., Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to
volunteer theoretical and practical
considerations. Current Directions in
Psychological Science. Vol. 8, p. 156 - 159.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-
8721.00037
Corn, B. W., Feldman, D. B., & Wexler, I. (2020). The
science of hope. The Lancet
Oncology, Vol. 21, Issue 9, p. 452 -
459. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30210-2
Daft, R. L. (2015). Organization theory and design.
Cengage Learning.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality
orientations scale: Self-determination in
personality. Journal of Research in
Personality, Vol. 19, Issue, 2, p. 109 134.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-
6566(85)90023-6
Dill, K. (2017). 7 Things Employers Should Know about
the Gen Z Workforce, Forbes.
Dolot, A. (2018). The characteristic of Generation Z. E-
mentor, Issue 74, p. 44 - 50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15219/em74.135
1
Elmore, T. (August 15, 2015). How Generation Z
Differs from Generation Y. Growing
Leaders Blog. Retrieved from
https://growingleaders.com/blog/generation-
z-differs- generation-y/
European Commission. (2012). Effects and impact of
entrepreneurship programmes in higher
education.
Fernandes, A. A. R. (2018). The effect of organization
culture and technology on motivation,
knowledge asset and knowledge
management. International Journal of Law
and Management, Vol. 60, Issue 5, p.
1087 - 1096.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-05-
2017-0105
Filipuzzi, M. (2016). Nuevas generaciones y empleo.
Características psicosociales de las
generaciones Z y su inserción en las
estructuras organizacionales asociadas al
empleo. Journal de Ciencias Sociales (88-
98), Año 5, N°8,
https://doi.org/10.18682/jcs.v0i8.61
0
Fodor, M., Jäckel , K & Pal Szilagyi , T.. (2018),
Challenges of starting a success career from
the aspect of the Z generation, Keleti Faculty
of Business and Management, p. 93-107.
Francis, T., Hoefel, F. (2018). True Gen': Generation Z
and its implications for companies, McKinsey
& Company.
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
89
Gabrielova, K., & Buchko, A. (2021). Here comes
Generation Z: Millennials as managers,
Kelley School of Business, Indiana
University. V. 64 issue: 4, pp. 489-499
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.202
1.02.013
Galeano, N. (2020). Teletrabajo y salud mental en
tiempos del Covid-19. Gestión práctica
de riesgos laborales: Integración y
desarrollo de la gestión de la prevención,, v.
185, 6263.
Ghosal, S., Bhattacharyya, R., & Majumder, M. (2020).
Impact of complete lockdown on total
infection and death rates: A hierarchical
cluster analysis. Diabetes & Metabolic
Syndrome: Clinical Research &
Reviews, 14(4), 707-711
Goh, E., Okumus, F. (2020). Avoiding the hospitality
workforce bubble: Strategies to attract
and retain generation Z talent in the
hospitality workforce. Tourism Management
Perspectives, vol 33, p. 7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100603
Goh, E. & Lee, C. (2017), A workforce to be reckoned
with: the emerging pivotal Generation
Z hospitality workforce. International
Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 73,
pp. 20-28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.016
Grow, J.M. & Yang, S. (2018), “Generation Z enters the
advertising workplace:
expectations through a gendered lens”.
Journal of Advertising Education, Vol. 22 No.
1, pp. 7-22.
Half, R. (2015). Get Ready for Generation Z. Retrieved
from
https://www.roberthalf.com/blog/the-future-of-
work/get-ready-for-generation-z
Hampton, D. & Welsh, D. (2019). Work values of
Generation Z nurses, The Journal of Nursing
Administration, Vol. 49 Issue 10, p. 480-486.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNA.000000000000
0791
Harris, M., & Gibson, S. (2008). An examination of the
entrepreneurial attitudes of US versus
chinese students. American Journal
of Entrepreneurship, Vol. 1, Issue 1, p. 1.
Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and
the world of work: An organization and
management perspective. Journal of
Business and Psychology, Vol. 25, Issue 2, p.
211223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-
010-9160-y.
Herrero M. T. V., Ramírez Iñiguez de la Torre, M-V.,
Barbero, L.R., & Ruiz de la Torre, E.
(2021). Aspectos preventivos en migraña y
trabajo. Encuesta europea. Archivos de
Prevención de Riesgos Laborales. V.
24 núm. 1
https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2021.2
4.01.03
Hope, J. (2016). Get your campus ready for generation
Z. Vol. 19, Issue 7, p. 13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/say.30253
Jiri, B. (2016). The Employees of Baby Boomers
Generation, Generation X, Generation Y
and Generation Z in Selected Czech
Corporations as Conceivers of Development
and Competitiveness in their Corporation.
Journal of Competitiveness. Vol. 8, Issue 4,
pp. 105 - 123, DOI:
10.7441/joc.2016.04.07
Kapil, Y., & Roy, A. (2014). A Critical Evaluation of
Generation Z at Workplaces.
International Journal of Social
Relevance & Concern, Vol. 2, Issue 1, p. 10 -
14.
Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study
of attitudes. Public Opinion. Quarterly.
Vol. 24, p. 163 - 204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/266945
Kirchmayer, Z., & Fratričová, J. (2018). What motivates
generation Z at work? Insights into
motivation drivers of business
students in Slovakia. Innovation Management
and Education Excellence through Vision
2020, pp. 6019 - 6030.
Krishnan, R., Loon, K.W., & Tan, N.Z. (2018). The
effects of job satisfaction and work-life
balance on employee task
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
90
performance. International Journal of
Academic Research in Business and
Social Sciences, Vol. 8, Issue 3, p. 652 - 662.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v
8-i3/3956
Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric Multidimensional
Scaling: A Numerical Method. Psychometrika,
2, 115-129.
Kubátová, J. (2016). Work-Related Attitudes of Czech
Generation Z: International
Comparison. Central European
Business Review, Vol. 5, Issue 4, p. 61 - 70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.167
Kulcsár, N. (2020). Motivation factors for generation Z
in higher education. Developing
Technology mediation in learning
environments. pp. 206 - 220.
DOI:10.4018/978-1- 7998-1591-
4.ch012
Lanier, K. (2017). 5 Things HR professionals need to
know about generation Z: thought leaders
share their views on the HR profession and its
direction for the future. Strategic HR
Review, Vol. 16, Issue 6, p. 288 - 290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SHR-08-
2017-0051
Lenhart, A., Smith, M., Anderson, M., & Perrin, A.
(2015). Teens, social media, and
technology overview 201, Pew Research
Center.
Linne, J. (2014). Two generations of digital natives.
Journal Revista Brasileira de Ciências
da Comunicação. v.37, n.2, p.
203-220, http:// DOI 10.1590/1809-5844
20149
Ma, J., Hu Z., & Gocłowska M.A. (2016). Cultural
orientation in China: Differences across five
generations of employees. Social Behavior
and Personality, vol. 44, Issue 4, p. 529 - 540.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.4.529
McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and
values determine what
people do. American Psychologist, 40(7), 812825.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-
066X.40.7.812
Miller, L.J., & Lu, W. (2018). Gen Z Is Set to Outnumber
Millennials Within a Year, Bloomberg News.
Mintel (2021). US Marketing to Generation Z market.
Retrieve from
https://store.mintel.com/report/us-marketing-
to-generation-z-us-market-report
Mischel, W. (1977). On the future of personality
measurement. American Psychologist, Vol.
32, Issue 4, p. 246- 272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.4.246
Mondres, T. (2019). How Generation Z is changing
financial services. ABA Banking Journal,
Vol. 111, Issue 1, p. 24 - 28.
Mukherjee, S. P., Sinha, B. K., & Chattopadhyay, A. K.
(2018). Multidimensional scaling. In Statistical
Methods in Social Science Research (pp.
113-122). Springer, Singapore.
Mulca, M., & Dhame, A. (2019). Multidimensional
Scaling as a Tool to Analyze the Structure in
Datasets. ROMAI Journal, 15(2).
Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is It Age or IT: First
Steps towards Understanding the
Netgeneration, In D. Oblinger, & J.
Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation
pp. 2.1-2.20. Boulder, CO:
EDUCAUSE. Retrieve from:
www.educause.edu/educatingthenet
gen
Ozkan, M., & Solmaz, B. (2015) The Changing Face of
the Employees Generation Z and Their
Perceptions of Work. Procedia Economics
and Finance. Vol. 26, p. 476483.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-
5671(15)00876-X
Parija, S.C, & Shanmuganathan, P. (2020). Podcast -
An apt learning tool for generation Z.
Annals of SBV, Vol. 9, Issue 1, p. 1 -
5. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10085-8121
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
91
Pataki-Bitto, F., & Kapusy, K. (2021). Work
environment transformation in the post
COVID- 19 based on work values of the future
workforce. Journal of Corporate Real Estate.
vol. 23 No. 3, 2021 pp. 151-169 DOI
10.1108/JCRE-08-2020-0031
Patel, D. (2017). The top 5 traits Gen Z looks for in
leaders, Forbes. Retrieved from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/deepp
atel/2017/08/27/the-top-5-traits-gen-z-looks-
for- in-leaders/?sh=25d45a2f609d
Pauli, J., Guadagnin, A., & Ruffatto, J. (2020). Values
relating to work and future perspective
for generation Z. Revista de Ciências
Da Administração, 22(57), 821. DOI
: 10.5007/2175-8077.2020.e77243
Pearson Higher Education Survey. (2018). What Do
Generation Z and Millennials Expect
from Technology in Education?.
Retrieved from
https://www.pearson.com/ped-
blogs/blogs/2018/05/generation-z-
millennials-expect-technology-education.html
Pew Research Center. (2012). Communication
choices: Texting dominates teens’ general
communication choices. Retrieve from:
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2012/0
3/19/communication-choices/
Pichler, S., Kohli, C, & Granitz, N. (2021). DITTO for
Gen Z: A framework for leveraging the
uniqueness of the new generation. Business
Horizons. Vol. 64, Issue 5, p. 599-610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.02
1
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants
Part 2: Do They Really Think
Differently?", On the Horizon, Vol. 9 No. 6, pp.
1-6
https://doi.org/10.1108/1074812011
0424843
Randstand (2016). Gen Z and millennials collide at
work, Randstad. Retrieved from
https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/4095
77/Pre-
Team%20Drive%20PDFs/Randstad
_GenZ_Millennials_Collide_Report.pdf
Ravi, D. (2020). Job Characteristics as a Determinant
of Intrinsic Motivation: an empirical study of
Generation z. Journal of Strategic Human
Resource Management. V. 9 (2 & 3) 2020,
pp 29-40 http://publishingindia.com/jshrm/
Ridderstrale, J.N. (2004). Karaoke Kapitalizmus - Az
emberiség menedzsmentje. Wolters
Kluver.
Rothman, D. (2016). A tsunami of learners called
generation Z. Public Safety: A State of Mind.
Retrieved from
https://mdle.net/Journal/A_Tsunami_of_Lear
ners_Called_Generation_Z.pdf
Ruperti-Lucero, E., Gómez-Pin, L., & Palma-
Hernández, M. (2020). Características
vocacionales y comportamiento
social de la Generación Z. Caso El Triunfo,
Ecuador. Maskana. Vol.. 11(1), 26
32. https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.11.01.03
Santos, G. G. (2016). Career barriers influencing
career success. Career Development
International, Vol. 21, Issue 1, p. 60 -
84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-
2015-0035
Schroth, H.. (2019). Are you ready for Generation Z in
the workplace?, California Management
Review. Vol. 61, Issue. 3, p. 5 18.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and
structure ofvalues: theory and empirical
tests in 20 countries. Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
Schwabel, D. (2014). Gen Y and Gen Z Global
Workplace Expectations Study. Workplace
Intelligence. Retrieve from:
http://workplaceintelligence.com/geny-genz-
global- workplace-expectations-study/
Schwieger, D., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Reaching and
Retaining the Next Generation: Adapting
to the Expectations of Gen Z in the
ISSN Electrónico 2500-9338
Enero Abril. Volumen 25 Número 1, Año 2025 Págs. 62 - 93
92
Classroom. Information System Education
Journal, Vol. 16, p. 45 - 54.
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z:
Educating and Engaging the Next
Generation of Students. About
Campus. V. 22 (3) pp. 21-26
Sharma, S., & Batra, N. (2019). Comparative study of
single linkage, complete linkage, and ward
method of agglomerative clustering. In 2019
International Conference on Machine
Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel
Computing (COMITCon) pp. 568-573. IEEE.
Sidorcuka, I., & Chesnovicka, A. (2017). Methods of
attraction and retention of Generation
Z staff. CBU Inter-national
Conference Proceedings, Vol. 5, p. 807 - 814.
http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.1
030
Silinevica, I. & Meirule, L. (2019), Generation X enters
into the Latvian business environment,
Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 11, pp.
97-107.
Singh, A. P., & Dangmei, J. (2016). Understanding the
generation Z: The future workforce. South-
Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Vol.
3, Issue 3, p. 15.
Safrankova, J. M., & Sikyr, M. (2019). Management
and Diversity Management in SMEs in
The Czech Republic. Marketing and
Management of Innovations, 1, 221-228.
http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.1-
18
Southgate, D. (2017). The emergence of generation Z
and its impact in advertising: Long term
implications for media planning and creative
development. Journal of Advertising
Research, Vol. 57, Issue 2, p. 227 - 235.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2017-
028
Spitznagel, E. (2020). Generation Z is bigger than
millennials—and they’re out to change the
world. Retrieve from
https://nypost.com/2020/01/25/generation-z-
is-bigger-than- millennials-and-theyre-out-
to-change-the-world/
Statnickė, G., Savanevičienė, A., & Šakys, I. (2019).
The relationship between work engagement of
different generations and mobile learning.
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae
Mendelianae Brunensis, Vol. 67, Issue 6, p.
1627 1642.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061
627
Steinerowska-Streb, I., Wziątek-Staśko, A. (2016).
Effective Motivation of Multi-generation
Teams-Presentation of own
Research Results. Proceeding of the
Management International Conference, p.
81 - 82.
Sujansky, J., & Ferri-Reed, J. (2009). Keeping the
millennials: Why companies are losing billions
in turnover to this generation- And what to do
about it. Jhon Wiley and Sons Ed. ISBN: 978-
0-470-43851-0.
Thang N. N.., Mai V. D.., Chris R. & Mirjana P. B.
(2022). Generation Z job seekers’
expectations and their job pursuit intention:
Evidence from transition and emerging
economy. International Journal of Engineering
Business Management. V. 14 pp 1-13 DOI:
10.1177/18479790221112548
Topuzovska Latkovikja, M., & Borota Popovskab, M.
(2020). How Millennials, Gen z, and
Technology are changing the Workplace
design? CEUR Workshop Proceedings
(CEUR-WS.org). V. 2789
Torgerson, W. (1952). Multidimensional scaling: I.
Theory and method. Psychometrika, 17, 401-
419.
Tulgan, B. (2013). Meet Generation Z: The second
generation within the giant “millennial” cohort.
New Haven, CT: Rainmaker Thinking.
Centennials or Generations Z and its demands to choose workplace: Comparative study between Colombia and Peru
Daniel Antonio Herrera Gonzalez
93
Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and
Social Interest. The Journal of Individual
Psychology Vol. 71, Issue 2, p. 10313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021
Twenge, J.M. (2017). iGen: Why Today's Super-
Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less
Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less
Happy and Completely Unprepared for
Adulthood. New York, NY: Atria.
https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12345
Tysiac, K. (2017). Get ready for Gen Z. J. Journal of
Accountancy. Retrieve from
https://www.journalofaccountancy.co
m/issues/2017/aug/generation-z-enters-
workforce.html
Urick, M.J., Hollensbe, E.C., Masterson, S.S., & Lyons,
S.T. (2017). Understanding and managing
intergenerational conflict: An examination of
influences and strategies. Work, Aging and
Retirement. Vol. 3, p. 166
185 https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw009
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of.
Sociology, Vol. 26, Issue 1, p. 215 - 240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so
c.26.1.215
Voced (2018). Deloitte Millennial Survey: millennials
disappointed in business, unprepared
for Industry 4.0. Retrieved from
https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:80961
Yu, A. (2019), Looking to hire Generation Z? Try
Instagram and video ads, Globe & Mail.
Retrieve from
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/c
areers/article-looking-to -hire-gen-z-try-
instagram-or-video-ads/